Let us decide: An analysis of educational equity indicator systems and the radical notion of community power

Using Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA), this study examines educational equity indicator systems in the United States to understand how equity indicators have been defined, the degree to which community members have meaningfully participated in educational equity indicator projects, and the impact of local educational equity indicator systems on communities. We ground our analysis in standards for educational equity to assess the quality of each municipality’s indicator system, and we used a framework for community-based research to examine the role of community members in equity indicator development. Findings show that indicator systems did not involve the community in the leadership of indicator system development; most indicator systems that appear to be community-derived engage community members superficially; and indicator systems appear to have an indirect impact on communities. We conclude that indicator systems need to privilege community participation at each phase of indicator development. Without such engagement, indicator development projects risk reinscribing existing inequities and power dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equity in Education & Society
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461251371317
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Let us decide: An analysis of educational equity indicator systems and the radical notion of community power

Adrienne C. Goss, Brenda Santos
Equity in Education & Society
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Let us decide: An analysis of educational equity indicator systems and the radical notion of community power

Adrienne C. Goss, Brenda Santos
article en

Abstract

Using Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA), this study examines educational equity indicator systems in the United States to understand how equity indicators have been defined, the degree to which community members have meaningfully participated in educational equity indicator projects, and the impact of local educational equity indicator systems on communities. We ground our analysis in standards for educational equity to assess the quality of each municipality’s indicator system, and we used a framework for community-based research to examine the role of community members in equity indicator development. Findings show that indicator systems did not involve the community in the leadership of indicator system development; most indicator systems that appear to be community-derived engage community members superficially; and indicator systems appear to have an indirect impact on communities. We conclude that indicator systems need to privilege community participation at each phase of indicator development. Without such engagement, indicator development projects risk reinscribing existing inequities and power dynamics.

Equity in Education & Society
Brown University (US), Clark Atlanta University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Let us decide: An analysis of educational equity indicator systems and the radical notion of community power — Adrienne C. Goss, Brenda Santos · Equity in Education & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS