Uncovering the opportunity space for hybrid CO₂ capture processes: A techno-economic exploration

• Mapping of the techno-economic potential of hybrid processes for CO2 capture • Four hybrid processes designed based on membranes, adsorption and liquefaction • Promising costs (40-70 €/t) obtained for medium-to-high CO2 concentrations • Economic performance affected by the availability of clean and affordable electricity • Cost savings achievable if specific material properties are verified as realistic There exists a portfolio of technologies that can be deployed for post-combustion CO 2 capture. Each technology performs optimally at specific conditions, which will hardly coincide with exact industrial applications. Hybrid processes combine two (or more) technologies to perform the CO 2 separation. The goal is to design processes that allow each technology in the hybrid configuration to operate optimally, resulting in cost-effective CO 2 capture solutions. This study explores the feasibility of realizing this potential by mapping the techno-economic potential of selected hybrid processes across a wide spectrum of CO 2 concentrations, plant scales and energy system contexts. The four hybrid processes considered are: vacuum pressure swing adsorption (VPSA)-membrane, membrane-VPSA, VPSA-CO 2 liquefaction and membrane-CO 2 liquefaction. A consistent techno-economic optimization framework is developed to identify the optimal process characteristics and associated minimum cost for each case considered. The performances are compared against those of conventional standalone capture technologies – VPSA, membranes and chemical absorption. Hybrid processes show promising results for medium-to-high CO 2 concentrations (≈13%-30% CO 2 ), where costs in the range 40-70 €/t CO2 appear achievable. However, even when different levels of electricity price and emission intensity are considered, chemical absorption and membranes remain the two most cost-efficient processes in most of the cases considered with hybrid processes at least 15% more expensive. The material properties of membranes and adsorbents proved to have a significant impact on the expected performance. The sensitivity analysis showed how changing material properties assumption within relevant boundaries could modify the relative performance and advance hybrid processes, such as VPSA-membrane, as potentially attractive solutions, with the potential to decrease cost of more than 10% at specific industrial conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Capture Science & Technology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100498
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering the opportunity space for hybrid CO₂ capture processes: A techno-economic exploration

Simon Roussanaly, Sai Gokul Subraveti, Rubén M. Montañés, Donghoi Kim et al.
Carbon Capture Science & Technology
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
article

Uncovering the opportunity space for hybrid CO₂ capture processes: A techno-economic exploration

Simon Roussanaly, Sai Gokul Subraveti, Rubén M. Montañés, Donghoi Kim, Luca Riboldi, Rahul Anantharaman
article en

Abstract

• Mapping of the techno-economic potential of hybrid processes for CO2 capture • Four hybrid processes designed based on membranes, adsorption and liquefaction • Promising costs (40-70 €/t) obtained for medium-to-high CO2 concentrations • Economic performance affected by the availability of clean and affordable electricity • Cost savings achievable if specific material properties are verified as realistic There exists a portfolio of technologies that can be deployed for post-combustion CO 2 capture. Each technology performs optimally at specific conditions, which will hardly coincide with exact industrial applications. Hybrid processes combine two (or more) technologies to perform the CO 2 separation. The goal is to design processes that allow each technology in the hybrid configuration to operate optimally, resulting in cost-effective CO 2 capture solutions. This study explores the feasibility of realizing this potential by mapping the techno-economic potential of selected hybrid processes across a wide spectrum of CO 2 concentrations, plant scales and energy system contexts. The four hybrid processes considered are: vacuum pressure swing adsorption (VPSA)-membrane, membrane-VPSA, VPSA-CO 2 liquefaction and membrane-CO 2 liquefaction. A consistent techno-economic optimization framework is developed to identify the optimal process characteristics and associated minimum cost for each case considered. The performances are compared against those of conventional standalone capture technologies – VPSA, membranes and chemical absorption. Hybrid processes show promising results for medium-to-high CO 2 concentrations (≈13%-30% CO 2 ), where costs in the range 40-70 €/t CO2 appear achievable. However, even when different levels of electricity price and emission intensity are considered, chemical absorption and membranes remain the two most cost-efficient processes in most of the cases considered with hybrid processes at least 15% more expensive. The material properties of membranes and adsorbents proved to have a significant impact on the expected performance. The sensitivity analysis showed how changing material properties assumption within relevant boundaries could modify the relative performance and advance hybrid processes, such as VPSA-membrane, as potentially attractive solutions, with the potential to decrease cost of more than 10% at specific industrial conditions.

Carbon Capture Science & TechnologyVol. 17
SINTEF (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.