MBF 2025-wl-6927-Is Banking Consolidation at Odds with Financial Stability? The Case of India

This study examines the nexus between consolidation and financial stability in the context of a series of restructuring mergers that have occurred in the Indian banking sector in recent years. Employing a system-GMM two-stage panel regression model and a bias-corrected random effect model for the period from March 2012 to June 2022, the study concludes that mergers increase financial fragility, as measured by banks’ marginal risk contribution (MRC) to systemic risk. The destabilizing effect is also driven by bank-specific risk factors, standalone insolvency risk, and ownership characteristics, but is neutral to bank size. Furthermore, the build-up of good-quality capital for potential loss mitigation can alleviate the adverse impact on systemic risk. The results have important implications for macro-prudential policies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and political weekly/Economic & political weekly
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71279/epw.v60i22.44091
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MBF 2025-wl-6927-Is Banking Consolidation at Odds with Financial Stability? The Case of India

Gargi Sanati, Tasneem Chherawala
1 links
Economic and political weekly/Economic & political weekly
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

MBF 2025-wl-6927-Is Banking Consolidation at Odds with Financial Stability? The Case of India

Gargi Sanati, Tasneem Chherawala
article en

Abstract

This study examines the nexus between consolidation and financial stability in the context of a series of restructuring mergers that have occurred in the Indian banking sector in recent years. Employing a system-GMM two-stage panel regression model and a bias-corrected random effect model for the period from March 2012 to June 2022, the study concludes that mergers increase financial fragility, as measured by banks’ marginal risk contribution (MRC) to systemic risk. The destabilizing effect is also driven by bank-specific risk factors, standalone insolvency risk, and ownership characteristics, but is neutral to bank size. Furthermore, the build-up of good-quality capital for potential loss mitigation can alleviate the adverse impact on systemic risk. The results have important implications for macro-prudential policies.

Economic and political weekly/Economic & political weeklyVol. 60(22)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.