Non–Pulmonary Vein Triggers—Does Sex Matter?

Non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers can play a role in initiating atrial fibrillation (AF) and potentially contributing to AF recurrence after PV isolation. 1The complete weight of sex on AF ablation strategies and outcomes remains controversial due to mixed data. [2][3]3][4] However, data on sex-specific differences in non-PV triggers remain limited.Chaumont et al 5 report the results of a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing firsttime AF ablation from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania AF ablation registry between January 2020 and December 2022.The initial study on the stepwise non-PV triggers provocation protocols and mapping for these patients was published in 2024. 6In this current study, Chaumont et al 5 examine sex-related differences in the types, prevalence, and site of origin of non-PV triggers.Non-PV triggers were defined as atrial ectopic beats triggering atrial tachycardia or AF, excluding atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia.The authors included 2038 patients who underwent first-time AF-ablation and non-PV trigger provocation.Of those, 67.2% were men, and 32.8% were women.They found the prevalence of non-PV triggers

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29535
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non–Pulmonary Vein Triggers—Does Sex Matter?

Lama Al Jebbawi, Arfaat Khan
JAMA Network Open
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Non–Pulmonary Vein Triggers—Does Sex Matter?

Lama Al Jebbawi, Arfaat Khan
article en

Abstract

Non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers can play a role in initiating atrial fibrillation (AF) and potentially contributing to AF recurrence after PV isolation. 1The complete weight of sex on AF ablation strategies and outcomes remains controversial due to mixed data. [2][3]3][4] However, data on sex-specific differences in non-PV triggers remain limited.Chaumont et al 5 report the results of a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing firsttime AF ablation from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania AF ablation registry between January 2020 and December 2022.The initial study on the stepwise non-PV triggers provocation protocols and mapping for these patients was published in 2024. 6In this current study, Chaumont et al 5 examine sex-related differences in the types, prevalence, and site of origin of non-PV triggers.Non-PV triggers were defined as atrial ectopic beats triggering atrial tachycardia or AF, excluding atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia.The authors included 2038 patients who underwent first-time AF-ablation and non-PV trigger provocation.Of those, 67.2% were men, and 32.8% were women.They found the prevalence of non-PV triggers

JAMA Network OpenVol. 8(8)
Henry Ford Hospital (US), Michigan State University (US)
Michigan State University, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non–Pulmonary Vein Triggers—Does Sex Matter? — Lama Al Jebbawi, Arfaat Khan · JAMA Network Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS