Carbon markets and firms’ perceived climate regulatory risk

This study examines how involvement in emissions trading schemes (ETS) affects firm climate regulatory risks (FCRR) across 36 countries from 2003 to 2021. We find a positive link between ETS membership and FCRR. Furthermore, we investigate how governance structures and firm-specific factors influence this relationship. Our analysis indicates that factors such as financial constraints, CEO network size, CEO tenure, the number of independent directors, and board size can lessen the impact of ETS membership on FCRR. Conversely, higher corporate political risk, membership in carbon-intensive industries, and a greater number of co-opted board members intensify this effect. Early participation in the scheme appears to reduce the firms' climate regulatory risk, while subsequent withdrawal increases it. Notably, the influence of ETS on FCRR is mainly observed among firms operating in developed economies. Legislative shocks, such as the EU Climate and Energy Package, diminish the positive effect of the ETS on FCRR. Overall, our findings highlight the sensitivity of firm-level climate regulatory risk to strategic decisions regarding ETS participation and exit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127050
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon markets and firms’ perceived climate regulatory risk

Gbenga Adamolekun, Hao Li, Xu Bing
Journal of Environmental Management
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Carbon markets and firms’ perceived climate regulatory risk

Gbenga Adamolekun, Hao Li, Xu Bing
article en

Abstract

This study examines how involvement in emissions trading schemes (ETS) affects firm climate regulatory risks (FCRR) across 36 countries from 2003 to 2021. We find a positive link between ETS membership and FCRR. Furthermore, we investigate how governance structures and firm-specific factors influence this relationship. Our analysis indicates that factors such as financial constraints, CEO network size, CEO tenure, the number of independent directors, and board size can lessen the impact of ETS membership on FCRR. Conversely, higher corporate political risk, membership in carbon-intensive industries, and a greater number of co-opted board members intensify this effect. Early participation in the scheme appears to reduce the firms' climate regulatory risk, while subsequent withdrawal increases it. Notably, the influence of ETS on FCRR is mainly observed among firms operating in developed economies. Legislative shocks, such as the EU Climate and Energy Package, diminish the positive effect of the ETS on FCRR. Overall, our findings highlight the sensitivity of firm-level climate regulatory risk to strategic decisions regarding ETS participation and exit.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 393
Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.