Cytoreductive Surgery in Ovarian Cancer: Should the New Optimal Threshold Be 2.5 mm?

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: In patients with peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer, current clinical guidelines recommend "optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS)", defined as leaving no residual tumor nodules greater than 1 cm in diameter. Of note, the 1 cm threshold is somewhat arbitrary, as even a minimal residual tumor burden may adversely impact the patient's outcomes. The aim of the current study is to identify the independent risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after "optimal" CRS, with a special focus on the impact of completeness of cytoreduction (defined according to Sugarbaker's scoring system). <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included all the patients with peritoneal metastasis from ovarian cancer who underwent "optimal CRS" (residual nodules less than 1 cm), performed by a single team. Regarding the completeness of cytoreduction (CC), the patients were divided into two groups (without residual disease or with residual nodules less than 2.5 mm (CC0/CC1), and those with residual nodules larger than 2.5 mm and less than 1 cm ("optimal" CC2)). Risk factors associated with OS and PFS were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. <b>Results</b>: Between September 2010 and February 2025, 52 patients with a median age of 62 [53.25-66.5] years underwent "optimal" CRS. For the entire group, the median OS was 70.83 months, and the median PFS was 25.8 months. In univariate analysis, the factors associated with significantly better OS were a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) lower or equal to 10 (vs. PCI > 10; <i>p</i> = 0.025) and CC0/CC1 status (vs. "optimal" CC2; <i>p</i> = 0.004), while in multivariate analysis, the only independent factor associated with higher OS was CC0/CC1 (HR = 0.253; 95% CI: 0.092-0.696, <i>p</i> = 0.008). Regarding PFS, the only factors independently associated with higher PFS were CC0/CC1 (HR = 0.155; 95% CI: 0.046-0.527, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and no preoperative chemotherapy (HR = 0.387; 95%CI: 0.155-0.963, <i>p</i> = 0.041). <b>Conclusions</b>: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to reveal that in patients with peritoneal metastases from ovarian carcinoma who underwent "optimal" CRS, the only independent factor associated with both better OS and PFS was the achievement of CC0/CC1 (no residual macroscopic nodules or residual nodules less than 2.5 mm). This observation supports the notion of redefining the threshold of "optimal" cytoreduction and potentially of implementing the Sugarbaker classification of cytoreduction even in ovarian cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176094
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cytoreductive Surgery in Ovarian Cancer: Should the New Optimal Threshold Be 2.5 mm?

Dan Brebu, Gheorghe Potlog, Radu Costea, Gabriel Adrian Popescu et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
3.40
article

Cytoreductive Surgery in Ovarian Cancer: Should the New Optimal Threshold Be 2.5 mm?

Dan Brebu, Gheorghe Potlog, Radu Costea, Gabriel Adrian Popescu, Teodora Delia Chiriac, Dana Galieta Mincă, Sorin Alexandrescu, Tudor Razvan Grigorie, Cosmin Verdea
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: In patients with peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer, current clinical guidelines recommend "optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS)", defined as leaving no residual tumor nodules greater than 1 cm in diameter. Of note, the 1 cm threshold is somewhat arbitrary, as even a minimal residual tumor burden may adversely impact the patient's outcomes. The aim of the current study is to identify the independent risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after "optimal" CRS, with a special focus on the impact of completeness of cytoreduction (defined according to Sugarbaker's scoring system). <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included all the patients with peritoneal metastasis from ovarian cancer who underwent "optimal CRS" (residual nodules less than 1 cm), performed by a single team. Regarding the completeness of cytoreduction (CC), the patients were divided into two groups (without residual disease or with residual nodules less than 2.5 mm (CC0/CC1), and those with residual nodules larger than 2.5 mm and less than 1 cm ("optimal" CC2)). Risk factors associated with OS and PFS were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. <b>Results</b>: Between September 2010 and February 2025, 52 patients with a median age of 62 [53.25-66.5] years underwent "optimal" CRS. For the entire group, the median OS was 70.83 months, and the median PFS was 25.8 months. In univariate analysis, the factors associated with significantly better OS were a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) lower or equal to 10 (vs. PCI > 10; <i>p</i> = 0.025) and CC0/CC1 status (vs. "optimal" CC2; <i>p</i> = 0.004), while in multivariate analysis, the only independent factor associated with higher OS was CC0/CC1 (HR = 0.253; 95% CI: 0.092-0.696, <i>p</i> = 0.008). Regarding PFS, the only factors independently associated with higher PFS were CC0/CC1 (HR = 0.155; 95% CI: 0.046-0.527, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and no preoperative chemotherapy (HR = 0.387; 95%CI: 0.155-0.963, <i>p</i> = 0.041). <b>Conclusions</b>: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to reveal that in patients with peritoneal metastases from ovarian carcinoma who underwent "optimal" CRS, the only independent factor associated with both better OS and PFS was the achievement of CC0/CC1 (no residual macroscopic nodules or residual nodules less than 2.5 mm). This observation supports the notion of redefining the threshold of "optimal" cytoreduction and potentially of implementing the Sugarbaker classification of cytoreduction even in ovarian cancer.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(17)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO), Institute for Diagnosis and Animal Health (RO), Institutul Clinic Fundeni (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.