Evaluation of Peanut Physiological Responses to Heat and Drought Stress Across Growth Chamber and Field Environments

Heat-exacerbated drought stress is becoming increasingly common in crop production systems, including peanuts, yet limited information exists on how peanut cultivars respond to this combined stress. While controlled environments allow for the isolation of these stress effects, their relevance to field conditions remains unclear. In this study, five Virginia-type peanut cultivars were evaluated under four treatments in a growth chamber environment, i.e., control, heat, drought, and combined heat and drought stress; and under two treatments in the field environment, i.e., rainfed control, and combined heat and drought stress using rainout shelters. The physiological traits assessed included stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, as well as leaf temperature difference. In both environments, combined heat and drought resulted in a significant decline in physiological performance compared to control conditions. On average, stomatal conductance decreased by 65% in the growth chamber and 21% in the field under combined heat and drought stress, while transpiration was reduced by 49% and 24%, respectively. In the growth chamber, leaf temperature difference increased by 40% under combined stress, whereas it was not statistically different under field conditions. Correlations of the physiological responses between growth chamber and field were stronger under combined stress conditions than under control conditions. Principal component analysis revealed clear genotypic separation based on gas exchange and thermal traits, with NC 20 and Sullivan consistently associated with higher stomatal conductance and transpiration under stress across environments, indicating greater physiological resilience, while Emery clustered with traits linked to stress susceptibility. These findings underscore the significant impacts of combined stress in peanut production and highlight the importance of evaluating cultivar responses under both controlled and field environments to guide crop improvement strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172687
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peanut Plant Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Peanut Physiological Responses to Heat and Drought Stress Across Growth Chamber and Field Environments

Ranadheer Reddy Vennam, David C. Haak, Maria Balota, Keely M. Beard
1 citations
Plants
Peanut Plant Research Studies
1.75
article

Evaluation of Peanut Physiological Responses to Heat and Drought Stress Across Growth Chamber and Field Environments

Ranadheer Reddy Vennam, David C. Haak, Maria Balota, Keely M. Beard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Heat-exacerbated drought stress is becoming increasingly common in crop production systems, including peanuts, yet limited information exists on how peanut cultivars respond to this combined stress. While controlled environments allow for the isolation of these stress effects, their relevance to field conditions remains unclear. In this study, five Virginia-type peanut cultivars were evaluated under four treatments in a growth chamber environment, i.e., control, heat, drought, and combined heat and drought stress; and under two treatments in the field environment, i.e., rainfed control, and combined heat and drought stress using rainout shelters. The physiological traits assessed included stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, as well as leaf temperature difference. In both environments, combined heat and drought resulted in a significant decline in physiological performance compared to control conditions. On average, stomatal conductance decreased by 65% in the growth chamber and 21% in the field under combined heat and drought stress, while transpiration was reduced by 49% and 24%, respectively. In the growth chamber, leaf temperature difference increased by 40% under combined stress, whereas it was not statistically different under field conditions. Correlations of the physiological responses between growth chamber and field were stronger under combined stress conditions than under control conditions. Principal component analysis revealed clear genotypic separation based on gas exchange and thermal traits, with NC 20 and Sullivan consistently associated with higher stomatal conductance and transpiration under stress across environments, indicating greater physiological resilience, while Emery clustered with traits linked to stress susceptibility. These findings underscore the significant impacts of combined stress in peanut production and highlight the importance of evaluating cultivar responses under both controlled and field environments to guide crop improvement strategies.

PlantsVol. 14(17)
Virginia Tech (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Peanut Plant Research Studies
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.