Identifying predictors of formal help-seeking for premenstrual symptoms: A machine learning analysis of symptom, functional impairment and barriers data

Despite the potential severity and burden of premenstrual symptoms, few appear to seek formal care. Given that access to many therapeutic interventions requires formal help-seeking, it is important to understand predictors of this health behaviour. This study employed machine learning to identify symptoms, functional impairment, and barriers to accessing care that predict formal help-seeking for premenstrual symptoms. Data was collected from a UK-based sample using online survey software and explored using descriptive analysis. Group differences in ordinal and categorical data between those who have and have not sought formal help specifically for premenstrual symptoms were examined using Mann-Whitney U tests and Chi-square tests, respectively. Predictive models of help-seeking were built using the decision tree-based machine learning method, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). A total of 592 participants with complete data who endorsed premenstrual symptoms in consecutive cycles were included for analysis. Of those, 57.26% (n = 339) had previously seen a healthcare professional specifically for premenstrual symptoms. The model predicting formal help-seeking demonstrated fair performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.75 (SD = 0.06), a sensitivity of 0.65 (SD = 0.10), and a specificity of 0.71 (SD = 0.11). The strongest predictors of formal help-seeking were impaired social functioning, thinking that symptoms were severe, impairment in work/studies, and a previous poor care experience for gynaecological/reproductive conditions. These insights may be leveraged to encourage help-seeking behaviour, potentially reducing unnecessary distress or impairment. Improved knowledge of premenstrual symptoms and disorders is vital to facilitate identification of severe symptoms and impaired functioning related to the menstrual cycle. Additionally, improved guidance on when to seek help is required to increase the rate of formal help-seeking, particularly for individuals with high-risk psychological symptoms such as suicidality. More work is needed to determine the specific mechanism by which previous poor care experiences drive further help-seeking for premenstrual symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS mental health.
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000274
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying predictors of formal help-seeking for premenstrual symptoms: A machine learning analysis of symptom, functional impairment and barriers data

Jakub Tomasik, Erin L. Funnell, Sabine Bahn, Nayra A Martin-Key
PLOS mental health.
Menstrual Health and Disorders
article

Identifying predictors of formal help-seeking for premenstrual symptoms: A machine learning analysis of symptom, functional impairment and barriers data

Jakub Tomasik, Erin L. Funnell, Sabine Bahn, Nayra A Martin-Key
article en

Abstract

Despite the potential severity and burden of premenstrual symptoms, few appear to seek formal care. Given that access to many therapeutic interventions requires formal help-seeking, it is important to understand predictors of this health behaviour. This study employed machine learning to identify symptoms, functional impairment, and barriers to accessing care that predict formal help-seeking for premenstrual symptoms. Data was collected from a UK-based sample using online survey software and explored using descriptive analysis. Group differences in ordinal and categorical data between those who have and have not sought formal help specifically for premenstrual symptoms were examined using Mann-Whitney U tests and Chi-square tests, respectively. Predictive models of help-seeking were built using the decision tree-based machine learning method, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). A total of 592 participants with complete data who endorsed premenstrual symptoms in consecutive cycles were included for analysis. Of those, 57.26% (n = 339) had previously seen a healthcare professional specifically for premenstrual symptoms. The model predicting formal help-seeking demonstrated fair performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.75 (SD = 0.06), a sensitivity of 0.65 (SD = 0.10), and a specificity of 0.71 (SD = 0.11). The strongest predictors of formal help-seeking were impaired social functioning, thinking that symptoms were severe, impairment in work/studies, and a previous poor care experience for gynaecological/reproductive conditions. These insights may be leveraged to encourage help-seeking behaviour, potentially reducing unnecessary distress or impairment. Improved knowledge of premenstrual symptoms and disorders is vital to facilitate identification of severe symptoms and impaired functioning related to the menstrual cycle. Additionally, improved guidance on when to seek help is required to increase the rate of formal help-seeking, particularly for individuals with high-risk psychological symptoms such as suicidality. More work is needed to determine the specific mechanism by which previous poor care experiences drive further help-seeking for premenstrual symptoms.

PLOS mental health.Vol. 2(8)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Stanley Medical Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.