International Comparison of Total Labor Productivity in China, America, Japan and South Korea—Measurement Based on the Nested World Input-Output Table

The existing world input-output tables are value-based input-output tables, not physical input-output tables. When conducting international comparisons, it is necessary to use purchasing power parity (PPP) as a conversion factor to compare productivity levels across countries. This paper calculates the PPPs for 16 industries in China, the U.S., Japan, and South Korea based on the 155 industries PPPs published by the ICP, and derives the price ratios for China-Japan, China-South Korea, and China-U.S. Furthermore, it transforms the total labor input for the 16 industries in China, the U.S., Japan, and South Korea, as calculated from the nested tables based on OECD's WIOD and Eora MRIO data, into real total labor input without price differences. This allows for a comparison of the total labor productivity levels across the four countries by industry. The results show that, overall, in 2011, the U.S. had a dominant position in total labor productivity among the four countries (China, the U.S., Japan, and South Korea). By industry, China's total labor productivity in secondary industries, such as food manufacturing, textile production, and electrical machinery manufacturing, lagged significantly behind that of the U.S., Japan, and South Korea, while the gap was smaller in transportation and communication services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Economy Quarterly
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/peq2024.9310406
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Comparison of Total Labor Productivity in China, America, Japan and South Korea—Measurement Based on the Nested World Input-Output Table

Hiroshi Izumi, Jie Li, Jinding Xing, Yanjuan DAI
Political Economy Quarterly
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

International Comparison of Total Labor Productivity in China, America, Japan and South Korea—Measurement Based on the Nested World Input-Output Table

Hiroshi Izumi, Jie Li, Jinding Xing, Yanjuan DAI
article en

Abstract

The existing world input-output tables are value-based input-output tables, not physical input-output tables. When conducting international comparisons, it is necessary to use purchasing power parity (PPP) as a conversion factor to compare productivity levels across countries. This paper calculates the PPPs for 16 industries in China, the U.S., Japan, and South Korea based on the 155 industries PPPs published by the ICP, and derives the price ratios for China-Japan, China-South Korea, and China-U.S. Furthermore, it transforms the total labor input for the 16 industries in China, the U.S., Japan, and South Korea, as calculated from the nested tables based on OECD's WIOD and Eora MRIO data, into real total labor input without price differences. This allows for a comparison of the total labor productivity levels across the four countries by industry. The results show that, overall, in 2011, the U.S. had a dominant position in total labor productivity among the four countries (China, the U.S., Japan, and South Korea). By industry, China's total labor productivity in secondary industries, such as food manufacturing, textile production, and electrical machinery manufacturing, lagged significantly behind that of the U.S., Japan, and South Korea, while the gap was smaller in transportation and communication services.

Political Economy QuarterlyVol. 3(4)
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN), Foreign Trade University (VN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.