Preliminary insights into cardiopulmonary reserve and hemodynamic stability: exploring submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters as potential predictors of intraoperative hemodynamic instability

Background Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with serious adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Preoperative predictors of IOH remain poorly characterized. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability is strongly associated with IOH. The authors hypothesized that submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (smCPET) measures of forced vital capacity (FVC) and gas-exchange derived pulmonary capacitance to peak oxygen uptake slope (GXCAP-VO 2 ) would be associated with two measures of intraoperative hemodynamic instability: intraoperative vasopressor use and systolic average real variability (ARV), respectively. Methods This secondary analysis of a feasibility study included adults >60 years undergoing elective noncardiac surgery and completed preoperative smCPET. Multiple cardiopulmonary measures, including FVC, peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) and GXCAP-VO 2 slope were collected. The primary outcome of intraoperative vasopressor use, and secondary outcome of ARV were tested with multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models to assess associations supported by decision boundary and mediation analysis. Results Among 101 participants, 54 had measured FVC (median 2.56 L) and 101 had measured GXCAP-VO 2 slope (median 29.8). After adjustment, each standard deviation increase in FVC (0.89 L) was associated with halved odds of vasopressor use [2.47 L (SD 0.88) vs. 2.9 L (SD 0.86) adjusted Odds Ratio: 0.496 (95% CI: 0.25–1.01) p = 0.052]. Participants with FVC <2.18 L and surgery duration >152 min had the highest risk of vasopressor use. Systolic ARV was negatively associated with increasing surgical time ( p < 0.001). For each 10-unit increase in GXCAP-VO 2 slope, systolic ARV is expected to decrease by 9.8% [incidence rate ratio = 0.902, 95% CI (0.84, 0.97)]. Conclusion Lower measured FVC and GXCAP-VO 2 slope were associated with measures of intraoperative hemodynamic instability in older adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Preoperative assessment of pulmonary function and cardiopulmonary reserve may identify patients at higher risk for intraoperative hemodynamic instability. These exploratory observations establish a foundation for future research on smCPET measures for the prediction of perioperative complications, recognizing intraoperative hemodynamic instability as a complex interplay of patient, anesthetic, and surgical factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Anesthesiology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fanes.2025.1610632
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary insights into cardiopulmonary reserve and hemodynamic stability: exploring submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters as potential predictors of intraoperative hemodynamic instability

Zyad James Carr, Daniel Agarkov
Frontiers in Anesthesiology
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Preliminary insights into cardiopulmonary reserve and hemodynamic stability: exploring submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters as potential predictors of intraoperative hemodynamic instability

Zyad James Carr, Daniel Agarkov
article en

Abstract

Background Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with serious adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Preoperative predictors of IOH remain poorly characterized. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability is strongly associated with IOH. The authors hypothesized that submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (smCPET) measures of forced vital capacity (FVC) and gas-exchange derived pulmonary capacitance to peak oxygen uptake slope (GXCAP-VO 2 ) would be associated with two measures of intraoperative hemodynamic instability: intraoperative vasopressor use and systolic average real variability (ARV), respectively. Methods This secondary analysis of a feasibility study included adults >60 years undergoing elective noncardiac surgery and completed preoperative smCPET. Multiple cardiopulmonary measures, including FVC, peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) and GXCAP-VO 2 slope were collected. The primary outcome of intraoperative vasopressor use, and secondary outcome of ARV were tested with multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models to assess associations supported by decision boundary and mediation analysis. Results Among 101 participants, 54 had measured FVC (median 2.56 L) and 101 had measured GXCAP-VO 2 slope (median 29.8). After adjustment, each standard deviation increase in FVC (0.89 L) was associated with halved odds of vasopressor use [2.47 L (SD 0.88) vs. 2.9 L (SD 0.86) adjusted Odds Ratio: 0.496 (95% CI: 0.25–1.01) p = 0.052]. Participants with FVC <2.18 L and surgery duration >152 min had the highest risk of vasopressor use. Systolic ARV was negatively associated with increasing surgical time ( p < 0.001). For each 10-unit increase in GXCAP-VO 2 slope, systolic ARV is expected to decrease by 9.8% [incidence rate ratio = 0.902, 95% CI (0.84, 0.97)]. Conclusion Lower measured FVC and GXCAP-VO 2 slope were associated with measures of intraoperative hemodynamic instability in older adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Preoperative assessment of pulmonary function and cardiopulmonary reserve may identify patients at higher risk for intraoperative hemodynamic instability. These exploratory observations establish a foundation for future research on smCPET measures for the prediction of perioperative complications, recognizing intraoperative hemodynamic instability as a complex interplay of patient, anesthetic, and surgical factors.

Frontiers in AnesthesiologyVol. 4
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.