ManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning.
We conducted a ManyClasses study in 30 different classes, where student participants (n = 1,571) were assigned to watch two online lecture videos, and one of these videos (order randomized) was immediately preceded by ungraded multiple-choice prequestions, with no feedback or answers shown. In the laboratory, decades of research have observed that prequestions reliably improve learning from subsequent instruction when compared to instruction not preceded by prequestions, but evidence in authentic education settings has been elusive. The current experiment, embedded in authentic classes ranging from sixth grade through senior-level college, with class-specific videos and questions created by teachers, confirmed that prequestions improve average student learning performance, measured by delayed classroom assessments that included the prequestions. Furthermore, we examined how prequestions affected students’ interactions with the online videos. Despite the generalizable average benefit of prequestions for student learning, we found that prequestions also caused some students to disengage, skipping the assigned video entirely. Among students who did watch the videos, there was no increase in the amount viewed after answering prequestions compared to videos with no prequestions. These findings lead us to suggest that prequestions do not increase attention to the subsequent learning materials, but rather, prequestions cause learners to activate a relevant mental model in advance of instruction. This account is corroborated by the finding that answering prequestions correctly was a significant moderator of the benefits of prequestions, suggesting that the prequestions, while beneficial on average, may cause a rich-get-richer scenario when implemented in authentic education settings. Educational Impact and Implications Statement: People look to psychological science for instructional strategies that may help improve education outcomes in practice. One promising strategy is to present prequestions, questions prior to instruction, which has yielded promising results across many laboratory studies but has limited evidence from authentic education settings. Here we ran a large-scale prequestion experiment across many classrooms, and observed that prequestions tend to improve student learning on average. However, we also found that these benefits depend on learners having relevant prior knowledge, and that prequestions may also cause some students with less prior knowledge to disengage. These results lead us to reconsider our understanding of the prequestion effect, demonstrating how a practical, real-world test can also inform psychological science.
Authors
- Kendall Moore (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8331-5021)
- Harmony Jankowski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-1435)
- Emily Reeves Fyfe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5420-360X)
- Ruth Stoddard Long (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3753-1392)
- Joshua R. de Leeuw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-2364)
- Richard A. Hullinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-4474)
- Alyssa Brown
- Laura Wagner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8557-4844)
- Kathy L. Ritchie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4068-4136)
- Benjamin Motz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-2184)
- Megan Mocko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-0220)
- Margaret Lion (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9235-9958)
- Kathryn Berlin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-5326)
- Ashish Aggarwal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8365-3810)
- Nancy J. Evans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1591-0275)
- Richard Yeager (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7001-6441)
- Keven Gregg
- Patrick Larkin
- Anna Chinni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2269-734X)
- Matthew Waite
- Heaven Hollender
- Andrew Findley
- Marissa Stanton
- Kelli Britten
- Laura Talcott
- Mariaelena Amato
- Kimberly Hansen
- Robert C. Gorman
- Anthony Mannarino
- Carrie Palmer
- Jeannie Scott
- Micki L. Cerchiaro
- Joseph A. Packowski
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2025-08-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000978
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Literacy, Media, and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 15.18
Funders
- U.S. Department of Education
- Institute of Education Sciences