Accuracy of guided insertion of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices comparing two different 3D printed surgical guide designs: a randomized controlled trial

Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) provide maximum anchorage in orthodontic therapy. Surgical guides can be used to accurately achieve pre-planned TAD positions. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of guided TAD insertion in the anterior palate, comparing two 3D printed surgical guide designs. Patients were randomized in two groups. TADs were inserted using either a surgical guide with a skeletonized design or full arch design. The primary outcome was translational and rotational deviations from the virtually planned TAD positions. Secondary outcomes included the dependence of deviations on age and gender and TAD success rate after a follow-up period of three months. In total 40 patients were included in this RCT and 80 TADs were inserted. During the follow-up period, no TAD loss was observed. The skeletonized design showed significantly higher deviations between the planned TAD position and the actual TAD position in all, but two spatial dimensions (translational and rotational) compared to the full arch design. The right TAD showed higher deviations compared to the left TAD for the skeletonized design. The full arch design showed significantly higher accuracy compared to the skeletonized design. During virtual planning of TAD positions, a safety distance should be considered to account for possible deviations using 3D printed surgical guides for TAD insertion in the anterior palate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12116-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of guided insertion of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices comparing two different 3D printed surgical guide designs: a randomized controlled trial

Andrea Wichelhaus, Hisham Sabbagh, Uwe Baumert, Lea Hoffmann et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
3.35
article

Accuracy of guided insertion of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices comparing two different 3D printed surgical guide designs: a randomized controlled trial

Andrea Wichelhaus, Hisham Sabbagh, Uwe Baumert, Lea Hoffmann, Tamara Katharina Kakoschke, Alexander Keller, Linus Hötzel, Sven Otto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) provide maximum anchorage in orthodontic therapy. Surgical guides can be used to accurately achieve pre-planned TAD positions. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of guided TAD insertion in the anterior palate, comparing two 3D printed surgical guide designs. Patients were randomized in two groups. TADs were inserted using either a surgical guide with a skeletonized design or full arch design. The primary outcome was translational and rotational deviations from the virtually planned TAD positions. Secondary outcomes included the dependence of deviations on age and gender and TAD success rate after a follow-up period of three months. In total 40 patients were included in this RCT and 80 TADs were inserted. During the follow-up period, no TAD loss was observed. The skeletonized design showed significantly higher deviations between the planned TAD position and the actual TAD position in all, but two spatial dimensions (translational and rotational) compared to the full arch design. The right TAD showed higher deviations compared to the left TAD for the skeletonized design. The full arch design showed significantly higher accuracy compared to the skeletonized design. During virtual planning of TAD positions, a safety distance should be considered to account for possible deviations using 3D printed surgical guides for TAD insertion in the anterior palate.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
3.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.