wl-4798-Visualising the Invisible: Re-examining Women’s Labour Force Participation in India

The categorisation used by India’s labour force surveys have failed to capture three evolving dynamics of labour market. Firstly, the gender difference in amount of work provided toward economic activities and contribution to GDP is overstated at present because the PLFS poorly records goods production within households when unpaid workers do non-monetized work. Secondly, the decision-making sharing within small firms has been underemphasized, too. The PLFS could benefit from separating non-decision makers (who are contributing family workers) explicitly from entrepreneurs. Thirdly, the gig economy and cottage industries have not been kept distinct from casual hourly labour, hence are confused with piecework in India. Taking these changes into account, we estimate that 6 percent of women currently considered inactive would become part of the labour force. Hence, we argue that methodological changes will be a small step in capturing the contribution of women in the economic activities. (146 words)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and political weekly/Economic & political weekly
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71279/epw.v60i21.42307
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

wl-4798-Visualising the Invisible: Re-examining Women’s Labour Force Participation in India

Wendy Olsen, Amaresh Dubey, Surbhi Malhotra, Sunil Kadyan Mona Chaudhary
Economic and political weekly/Economic & political weekly
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

wl-4798-Visualising the Invisible: Re-examining Women’s Labour Force Participation in India

Wendy Olsen, Amaresh Dubey, Surbhi Malhotra, Sunil Kadyan Mona Chaudhary
article en

Abstract

The categorisation used by India’s labour force surveys have failed to capture three evolving dynamics of labour market. Firstly, the gender difference in amount of work provided toward economic activities and contribution to GDP is overstated at present because the PLFS poorly records goods production within households when unpaid workers do non-monetized work. Secondly, the decision-making sharing within small firms has been underemphasized, too. The PLFS could benefit from separating non-decision makers (who are contributing family workers) explicitly from entrepreneurs. Thirdly, the gig economy and cottage industries have not been kept distinct from casual hourly labour, hence are confused with piecework in India. Taking these changes into account, we estimate that 6 percent of women currently considered inactive would become part of the labour force. Hence, we argue that methodological changes will be a small step in capturing the contribution of women in the economic activities. (146 words)

Economic and political weekly/Economic & political weeklyVol. 60(21)
Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.