Estimated extent of purchasing of antibiotics without a prescription from community pharmacies in a rural province in South Africa and the implications
Background Antimicrobial resistance is a considerable global health threat especially among low- and middle-income countries, exacerbated by considerable inappropriate dispensing of antibiotics. There have though been concerns with variable levels of dispensing of antibiotics without a prescription in South Africa. Consequently, a need to comprehensively estimate current levels of dispensing of antibiotics without a prescription, which was the aim of this study. Methods Administer a previously piloted questionnaire to all currently operating community pharmacies in a rural province, where dispensing of antibiotics without a prescription is likely to be greatest. The questionnaire included data on the estimated prevalence of antibiotics dispensed, their class and indication, and whether dispensed without a prescription. Community pharmacies were categorized into three: Independent, Chain and Franchise. Results 128/169 (75.7%) operational pharmacies participated, with independent pharmacies representing the majority (60.9%). There was a 78.3% response rate from 400 distributed questionnaires, including 106 pharmacists (33.9%) and 207 pharmacist assistants (66.1%) from 128 pharmacies. Antibiotics accounted for 47.9% (95% CI: 47.2%-48.6%) of all medicines dispensed. Penicillins were the most prevalent antibiotic dispensed (41.1%). Almost half (47.2%) of the antibiotics dispensed included macrolides, fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins, which are typically antibiotics from the Watch group. Sexually transmitted infections (33.5%) and upper respiratory tract infections (25.8%) were the most frequent indications for antibiotic dispensing. Overall, 69.3% of 128 participating pharmacies in this rural province in South Africa admitted to dispensing antibiotics without a prescription in the past 14 days, principally among independent pharmacies (98.7%). However, estimates suggest only 8.6% of the total volume of antibiotics being dispensed were dispensed without a prescription among the 88 community pharmacies admitting to this practice in the past 3 days. Encouragingly, 98.1% of community pharmacists and 97.6% of pharmacist assistants indicated they always or mostly offered symptomatic relief before dispensing antibiotics without a prescription to patients with self-limiting conditions. Conclusion There were considerable concerns regarding the prescribing and dispensing of antibiotics in this rural province including Watch antibiotics. This included the number of community pharmacies, especially independent pharmacies, where patients could purchase antibiotics without a prescription. Multiple strategies involving all key stakeholder groups are need to improve future antibiotic use across South Africa and reduce AMR.
Authors
- Stephen Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2328-4136)
- Tiyani Milta Maluleke
- Vanda Marković‐Peković (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-5720)
- Audrey Chigome (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7485-0970)
- Johanna C. Meyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-5713)
- Natalie Schellack (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9690-6285)
- Aislinn Cook
- Ana Golić Jelic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6883-4739)
- Brian Godman
- Morgan Tiyiselani Maluleke
Institutions
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- University of Banja Luka (BA)
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (ZA)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Nuffield Health (GB)
- École Africaine de la Météorologie et de l'Aviation Civile (NE)
- Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA)
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Tropical Diseases
- Published
- 2025-08-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2025.1637362
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.05
Funders
- National Research Foundation