Paths to none‐take‐up: Why people in need are not included in public welfare systems

Abstract This article is based on a study of individuals who are not receiving the public aid and benefits that they are entitled to, and in need of, what is known as ‘non‐take‐up’ (NTU). The aim of the study is to explore the various causes of NTU in the public welfare system in Sweden, and the main research question is why individuals that are eligible for public benefits do not receive them. This question is approached from a bottom‐up perspective, by interviewing 33 individuals in a NTU situation about their stories of interaction with public welfare institutions. The individuals were selected in collaboration with a charitable non‐profit organisation that receives people in need who are not receiving any other public support, or all the support they are entitled to. Through the use of content analysis, the interviews identify several causes of NTU. These include poor information and means of communication with welfare institutions, technocratic rules, unfriendly treatment and unprofessional behaviour among social workers, and interagency mismanagement of individual cases. The conclusions suggest that NTU is a serious problem in the Swedish welfare system that causes both unnecessary suffering and added costs to society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Welfare
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.70040
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paths to none‐take‐up: Why people in need are not included in public welfare systems

Johan Vamstad
International Journal of Social Welfare
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Paths to none‐take‐up: Why people in need are not included in public welfare systems

Johan Vamstad
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article is based on a study of individuals who are not receiving the public aid and benefits that they are entitled to, and in need of, what is known as ‘non‐take‐up’ (NTU). The aim of the study is to explore the various causes of NTU in the public welfare system in Sweden, and the main research question is why individuals that are eligible for public benefits do not receive them. This question is approached from a bottom‐up perspective, by interviewing 33 individuals in a NTU situation about their stories of interaction with public welfare institutions. The individuals were selected in collaboration with a charitable non‐profit organisation that receives people in need who are not receiving any other public support, or all the support they are entitled to. Through the use of content analysis, the interviews identify several causes of NTU. These include poor information and means of communication with welfare institutions, technocratic rules, unfriendly treatment and unprofessional behaviour among social workers, and interagency mismanagement of individual cases. The conclusions suggest that NTU is a serious problem in the Swedish welfare system that causes both unnecessary suffering and added costs to society.

International Journal of Social WelfareVol. 34(4)
Marie Cederschiöld University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.