Adapting UK maternity clinical information systems for observational research: The POOL cohort study

ObjectivesThe POOL study was commissioned to evaluate the safety of waterbirth in the UK using routine maternity and neonatal clinical data. We will describe the design, set-up and pilot for this data linkage study, as well as sharing challenges and successes from the process, and headline results. MethodsThis study used the novel method of amending an existing clinical maternity database (Euroking® Maternity Information System) for the purpose of collecting additional research data fields. In combination with the extraction of existing data fields, this maximised the potential use of existing routinely collected clinical data for research purposes, whilst reducing NHS staff data collection burden. Extracted data from UK NHS sites were transferred for matching with the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD) to ascertain outcomes for babies. Non-inferiority regression analysis was used to establish whether waterbirth was as safe for mothers and babies as leaving the water before birth. ResultsA total of 869,744 birth records were received from 26 NHS sites in England and Wales, between January 2015 and June 2022. For the pilot, 24,000 records were extracted from one site. Data completeness for maternal and neonatal primary outcomes were acceptable. Neonatal identifiers flowed to the NNRD for successful matching, resulting in neonatal records for 6.5% of pool users. Rates of the maternal outcomes (obstetric anal sphincter injury) and the composite adverse outcome among babies were no higher among waterbirths compared with births out of water (Nulliparous women: waterbirth 4.8% vs births out of water 5.3%; adjusted odds ratio 0.97, one-sided 95% confidence interval −∞ to 1.08); Parous women: 1.1% vs 1.7%; 0.64, −∞ to 0.78; Neonates: 2.7% vs 4.4%; 0.65, −∞ to 0.79). ConclusionAmending existing NHS information systems and accessing data at scale is possible, but is time consuming and technically challenging. Among women using water immersion during labour, remaining in the pool and birthing in water was not associated with an increase in the incidence of adverse primary maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i4.3132
Primary Topic
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting UK maternity clinical information systems for observational research: The POOL cohort study

Billie Hunter, Julia Sanders, Rachel Plachcinski, Sue Channon et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
article

Adapting UK maternity clinical information systems for observational research: The POOL cohort study

Billie Hunter, Julia Sanders, Rachel Plachcinski, Sue Channon, Christian Barlow, Judith Cutter, Peter Brocklehurst, Chris Gale, Rebecca Milton, Leah Morantz, Sarah Milosevic, Michael Robling, Fiona Lugg‐Widger, Rebecca L. Cannings-John, Shantini Paranjothy, Mervi Jokinen
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesThe POOL study was commissioned to evaluate the safety of waterbirth in the UK using routine maternity and neonatal clinical data. We will describe the design, set-up and pilot for this data linkage study, as well as sharing challenges and successes from the process, and headline results. MethodsThis study used the novel method of amending an existing clinical maternity database (Euroking® Maternity Information System) for the purpose of collecting additional research data fields. In combination with the extraction of existing data fields, this maximised the potential use of existing routinely collected clinical data for research purposes, whilst reducing NHS staff data collection burden. Extracted data from UK NHS sites were transferred for matching with the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD) to ascertain outcomes for babies. Non-inferiority regression analysis was used to establish whether waterbirth was as safe for mothers and babies as leaving the water before birth. ResultsA total of 869,744 birth records were received from 26 NHS sites in England and Wales, between January 2015 and June 2022. For the pilot, 24,000 records were extracted from one site. Data completeness for maternal and neonatal primary outcomes were acceptable. Neonatal identifiers flowed to the NNRD for successful matching, resulting in neonatal records for 6.5% of pool users. Rates of the maternal outcomes (obstetric anal sphincter injury) and the composite adverse outcome among babies were no higher among waterbirths compared with births out of water (Nulliparous women: waterbirth 4.8% vs births out of water 5.3%; adjusted odds ratio 0.97, one-sided 95% confidence interval −∞ to 1.08); Parous women: 1.1% vs 1.7%; 0.64, −∞ to 0.78; Neonates: 2.7% vs 4.4%; 0.65, −∞ to 0.79). ConclusionAmending existing NHS information systems and accessing data at scale is possible, but is time consuming and technically challenging. Among women using water immersion during labour, remaining in the pool and birthing in water was not associated with an increase in the incidence of adverse primary maternal or neonatal outcomes.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB), University of Aberdeen (GB), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal College of Midwives (GB), Cardiff and Vale College (GB), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.