Guarantee-time bias in modelling time-dependent exposure and competing risk events: an application in examining the relationship between use of calcium channel blockers and breast cancer

ObjectivesIncorrect handling of a time-dependent exposure can introduce guarantee-time bias (GTB), which leads to a spurious survival advantage in favour of the exposure group. We explore available approaches and apply them to examine the relationship between the long-term use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and breast cancer. MethodsWe examined various recommended approaches, including Landmark analysis and Joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data (JM) in terms of model specification and assumptions and compared their strengths and limitations. Using the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health surveys and linked data, we demonstrated how the methods could be applied to evaluate the long-term use of CCB (measured as time-dependent dose–-duration) and breast cancer, taking into account being at risk of multiple, mutually exclusive events (competing risks). ResultsIn a simple context where the exposure group can easily re-classify their exposure status at specific time points in the early stage of observation, the landmark approach is more efficient. JM is more rigorous when the time-dependent exposure experiences complex patterns (e.g., varying between individuals and within individuals) and correlation between the longitudinal measurements and the time-to-event outcomes. However, the application of JM is challenging. The findings from the application data, including visual presentations, will highlight meaningful differences between the methods and provide practical steps to overcome challenges in using JM to facilitate the use of the model in linked administrative data to examine long-term drug safety. ConclusionJM is a rigorous tool for handling GTB in examining the long-term effects of drug use on time-to-event outcomes. This provides a great opportunity to maximise the values of linked administrative data in evaluating drug safety, although caution is needed when setting model specifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i4.3153
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guarantee-time bias in modelling time-dependent exposure and competing risk events: an application in examining the relationship between use of calcium channel blockers and breast cancer

David Youens, Max Bulsara, Chau Le Bao Ho, Rachael Elizabeth Moorin et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Guarantee-time bias in modelling time-dependent exposure and competing risk events: an application in examining the relationship between use of calcium channel blockers and breast cancer

David Youens, Max Bulsara, Chau Le Bao Ho, Rachael Elizabeth Moorin, Ninh Thi Ha
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesIncorrect handling of a time-dependent exposure can introduce guarantee-time bias (GTB), which leads to a spurious survival advantage in favour of the exposure group. We explore available approaches and apply them to examine the relationship between the long-term use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and breast cancer. MethodsWe examined various recommended approaches, including Landmark analysis and Joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data (JM) in terms of model specification and assumptions and compared their strengths and limitations. Using the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health surveys and linked data, we demonstrated how the methods could be applied to evaluate the long-term use of CCB (measured as time-dependent dose–-duration) and breast cancer, taking into account being at risk of multiple, mutually exclusive events (competing risks). ResultsIn a simple context where the exposure group can easily re-classify their exposure status at specific time points in the early stage of observation, the landmark approach is more efficient. JM is more rigorous when the time-dependent exposure experiences complex patterns (e.g., varying between individuals and within individuals) and correlation between the longitudinal measurements and the time-to-event outcomes. However, the application of JM is challenging. The findings from the application data, including visual presentations, will highlight meaningful differences between the methods and provide practical steps to overcome challenges in using JM to facilitate the use of the model in linked administrative data to examine long-term drug safety. ConclusionJM is a rigorous tool for handling GTB in examining the long-term effects of drug use on time-to-event outcomes. This provides a great opportunity to maximise the values of linked administrative data in evaluating drug safety, although caution is needed when setting model specifications.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
Curtin University (AU), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.