Assessing access to primary care in rural and urban Wales

ObjectivesThis study aimed to provide evidence related to Primary Care access for individuals in rural Mid-Wales compared to urban areas to support service planning. We addressed the research questions: do individuals register with their nearest General Practice (GP) surgeries, and how far do patients travel to attend registered GP’s. MethodsWe created road network distances from each residential address in Wales to each GP surgery and linked with property and individual level data in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (SAIL) using the Welsh Demographic Service dataset. Cohorts consisted of individuals registered to single-site Wales-based GPs who provide healthcare data to SAIL. Study groups were assigned as Mid-Wales or Urban based on a selected list of Mid Wales GP’s, or urban GP location. We used descriptive statistics to examine differences for proportions of patients registered to their nearest, or a more distant GP, and distances travelled. Results Study groups consisted of 86,996 individuals registered at 15 GP surgeries, and 979,652 individuals registered at 136 GP surgeries for the study and comparator group respectively. 63% of the study group were registered to their nearest GP practice, compared to 45% in the urban comparison group, with wide variation within the study group across the GP’s (range: 24% to 95%). Mean distance travelled to primary care for the study group was 6.3km, compared with 2.3km in the comparator group, a statistically significant difference of 4.1km (p-value <0.05, confidence intervals 4.06-4.14km). Similar variation was noted within study GP surgeries, with a range 3.1km to 9.9km. ConclusionIn collaboration with Rural Health and Care Wales we combined administrative and Geographical data to provide evidence quantifying proportions of individuals registered to nearest GP’s, and distances travelled. This is important in the context of Welsh Government and NHS strategies towards community-based services, with wider implications for those in rural areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i4.3085
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing access to primary care in rural and urban Wales

Richard Fry, Rebecca Pedrick-Case, Rowena Bailey, Rhodri Johnson et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Assessing access to primary care in rural and urban Wales

Richard Fry, Rebecca Pedrick-Case, Rowena Bailey, Rhodri Johnson, Ronan A Lyons, Anna Prytherch
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aimed to provide evidence related to Primary Care access for individuals in rural Mid-Wales compared to urban areas to support service planning. We addressed the research questions: do individuals register with their nearest General Practice (GP) surgeries, and how far do patients travel to attend registered GP’s. MethodsWe created road network distances from each residential address in Wales to each GP surgery and linked with property and individual level data in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (SAIL) using the Welsh Demographic Service dataset. Cohorts consisted of individuals registered to single-site Wales-based GPs who provide healthcare data to SAIL. Study groups were assigned as Mid-Wales or Urban based on a selected list of Mid Wales GP’s, or urban GP location. We used descriptive statistics to examine differences for proportions of patients registered to their nearest, or a more distant GP, and distances travelled. Results Study groups consisted of 86,996 individuals registered at 15 GP surgeries, and 979,652 individuals registered at 136 GP surgeries for the study and comparator group respectively. 63% of the study group were registered to their nearest GP practice, compared to 45% in the urban comparison group, with wide variation within the study group across the GP’s (range: 24% to 95%). Mean distance travelled to primary care for the study group was 6.3km, compared with 2.3km in the comparator group, a statistically significant difference of 4.1km (p-value <0.05, confidence intervals 4.06-4.14km). Similar variation was noted within study GP surgeries, with a range 3.1km to 9.9km. ConclusionIn collaboration with Rural Health and Care Wales we combined administrative and Geographical data to provide evidence quantifying proportions of individuals registered to nearest GP’s, and distances travelled. This is important in the context of Welsh Government and NHS strategies towards community-based services, with wider implications for those in rural areas.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
Swansea University (GB), Centre for Integrated Research in the Rural Environment (GB), Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.