Consistently evaluating data linkage classification results

ObjectivesData linkage is commonly viewed as the problem of classifying record pairs into matches and non-matches. In situations where ground truth data are available, performance measures such as precision, recall, F-measure, sensitivity, and specificity, are commonly used to evaluate the quality of matches obtained with a trained data linkage classifier. MethodsComparing multiple classifiers using such measures can, however, lead to inconsistent evaluation because for a given measure the same numerical result can be obtained from different classification outcomes. This can cause a suboptimal classifier being selected and potentially result in linked data sets of poor quality. To overcome this problem, we propose the Consistent Record Linkage (CRL) measure, an application focused evaluation method that ensures data linkage classifiers are assessed in a fair and transparent way. The CRL-measure allows the definition of maximum acceptable error rates, and it provides information about the robustness of a classifier based on identified classification thresholds. ResultsUsing both synthetic and real-world data sets, we illustrate how the CRL-measure can provide more detailed information about the performance of data linkage classification results compared to traditional performance measures. Based on user selected maximum acceptable error rates, the CRL-measure identifies the range of classification thresholds where error rates are below these maximums, thereby obtaining high linkage quality. This indicates the robustness of a classifier with regard to a varying classification threshold. Furthermore, the CRL-measure shows a user if a given data linkage classifier is actually able to achieve a certain linkage quality or not. ConclusionThe CRL-measure provides users with consistent information about how multiple data linkage classifiers trained on the same data set perform comparatively. This will allow a better selection of the most suitable classifier for a given data linkage problem and lead to improved quality of linked data sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i3.3038
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consistently evaluating data linkage classification results

Peter Christen, Charini Nanayakkara, Sumayya Ziyad
International Journal for Population Data Science
Data Quality and Management
article

Consistently evaluating data linkage classification results

Peter Christen, Charini Nanayakkara, Sumayya Ziyad
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesData linkage is commonly viewed as the problem of classifying record pairs into matches and non-matches. In situations where ground truth data are available, performance measures such as precision, recall, F-measure, sensitivity, and specificity, are commonly used to evaluate the quality of matches obtained with a trained data linkage classifier. MethodsComparing multiple classifiers using such measures can, however, lead to inconsistent evaluation because for a given measure the same numerical result can be obtained from different classification outcomes. This can cause a suboptimal classifier being selected and potentially result in linked data sets of poor quality. To overcome this problem, we propose the Consistent Record Linkage (CRL) measure, an application focused evaluation method that ensures data linkage classifiers are assessed in a fair and transparent way. The CRL-measure allows the definition of maximum acceptable error rates, and it provides information about the robustness of a classifier based on identified classification thresholds. ResultsUsing both synthetic and real-world data sets, we illustrate how the CRL-measure can provide more detailed information about the performance of data linkage classification results compared to traditional performance measures. Based on user selected maximum acceptable error rates, the CRL-measure identifies the range of classification thresholds where error rates are below these maximums, thereby obtaining high linkage quality. This indicates the robustness of a classifier with regard to a varying classification threshold. Furthermore, the CRL-measure shows a user if a given data linkage classifier is actually able to achieve a certain linkage quality or not. ConclusionThe CRL-measure provides users with consistent information about how multiple data linkage classifiers trained on the same data set perform comparatively. This will allow a better selection of the most suitable classifier for a given data linkage problem and lead to improved quality of linked data sets.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.