Embedding Public Voices in Data Governance: Insights from the GUARDS Principles Consultation

ObjectivesThis project explored public perspectives on the GUARDS Principles, an overarching governance framework for the population data research community, which builds on existing good practice guidance. It evaluated the principles’ clarity, relevance, and impact on public trust in the use of data for research, promoting transparency and ethical practices. MethodsA survey, co-developed with HDR UK’s Public Advisory Board, was conducted from 17 June to 1 July 2024 among HDR UK Voices members, a network committed to shaping health data research. 50 participants assessed the six GUARDS Principles—Guided, Understandable, Aligned, Responsible, Deliver, and Stewardship—rating their agreement with each principle’s importance on a scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) and providing qualitative feedback on their reasoning, clarity of language and suggestions for improvement. Respondents received a £25 honorarium. Findings were synthesised to highlight strengths and areas for refinement, ensuring the principles reflect public values and expectations in data governance. ResultsSurvey findings showed strong public support for the GUARDS Principles, underscoring their importance in promoting transparency, inclusivity, and trust in data governance. While the principles were generally well understood, participants suggested simplifying language, outlining actionable implementation steps, and improving mechanisms for accountability and public engagement. Respondents also called for clearer definitions of 'public benefit' and emphasised the importance of independent and representative stewardship. These insights informed refinements to the principles, ensuring they align with public expectations whilst complementing existing good practices for safe and secure data access as outlined in the Five Safes framework. ConclusionPublic consultation on the GUARDS Principles highlighted the importance of public involvement in data governance. Findings reinforce the need for transparency, inclusive frameworks, and actionable measures. Refining the principles will ensure ethical research practices, enhance data accessibility, and foster public trust, improving the responsible use of data for public benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i4.3060
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embedding Public Voices in Data Governance: Insights from the GUARDS Principles Consultation

Rachel Brophy, Doreen Tembo, Sonia Patton, Andy Boyd et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Embedding Public Voices in Data Governance: Insights from the GUARDS Principles Consultation

Rachel Brophy, Doreen Tembo, Sonia Patton, Andy Boyd, Ester Bellavia, Cassie Smith
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesThis project explored public perspectives on the GUARDS Principles, an overarching governance framework for the population data research community, which builds on existing good practice guidance. It evaluated the principles’ clarity, relevance, and impact on public trust in the use of data for research, promoting transparency and ethical practices. MethodsA survey, co-developed with HDR UK’s Public Advisory Board, was conducted from 17 June to 1 July 2024 among HDR UK Voices members, a network committed to shaping health data research. 50 participants assessed the six GUARDS Principles—Guided, Understandable, Aligned, Responsible, Deliver, and Stewardship—rating their agreement with each principle’s importance on a scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) and providing qualitative feedback on their reasoning, clarity of language and suggestions for improvement. Respondents received a £25 honorarium. Findings were synthesised to highlight strengths and areas for refinement, ensuring the principles reflect public values and expectations in data governance. ResultsSurvey findings showed strong public support for the GUARDS Principles, underscoring their importance in promoting transparency, inclusivity, and trust in data governance. While the principles were generally well understood, participants suggested simplifying language, outlining actionable implementation steps, and improving mechanisms for accountability and public engagement. Respondents also called for clearer definitions of 'public benefit' and emphasised the importance of independent and representative stewardship. These insights informed refinements to the principles, ensuring they align with public expectations whilst complementing existing good practices for safe and secure data access as outlined in the Five Safes framework. ConclusionPublic consultation on the GUARDS Principles highlighted the importance of public involvement in data governance. Findings reinforce the need for transparency, inclusive frameworks, and actionable measures. Refining the principles will ensure ethical research practices, enhance data accessibility, and foster public trust, improving the responsible use of data for public benefit.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
Health Data Research UK (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.