The coding of migration status in English General Practice data from 2011 to 2024

ObjectivesMigration status is a determinant of health, but it is not routinely recorded in General Practice (GP) records. We explored the recording of migration-related SNOMED-CT codes (a structured clinical vocabulary used in GP records) over time in order to inform future research on migrants’ health using GP data. MethodWe used NHS England’s SNOMED Code Usage in Primary Care datasets from 2011/12 to 2023/24 within the opencodes R package to describe the use of SNOMED-CT codes relevant to migration. Codes were grouped into five codelists: 1) all migration-related codes, 2) country-of-birth codes, 3) immigration-legal-status codes, 4) asylum or refugee codes or 5) interpreter-related codes. We calculated the total and annual counts of recorded instances of any code within each codelist and for all SNOMED-CT codes and the annual percentages of migration-related codes compared to all SNOMED-CT code usage. ResultsFrom 2011/12 to 2023/24, there were over 30 million instances of 1118 migration-related SNOMED-CT codes being recorded in GP records. Migration coding increased over time, with a particularly sharp increase during the COVID-19 period. Whilst we also observed a similar trend for overall SNOMED-CT coding, the percentage of migration coding compared to overall SNOMED-CT code usage increased from 0.067% in 2011/12 to 0.082% in 2023/24. The most commonly recorded codes indicated the need for an interpreter and a main spoken language of Polish, Romanian or Urdu. Amongst all uses of country-of-birth codes, the five most common were India, Pakistan, Romania, Nigeria and China. The most common legal status codes were related to asylum or refugee status. ConclusionMigration coding has improved over time, particularly following COVID-19, indicating the feasibility of using GP records to research the health of migrants in England. However, there may be biases in the types of migrants who are coded by GP staff, which is important to consider when interpreting results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i4.3310
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The coding of migration status in English General Practice data from 2011 to 2024

Lucinda Hiam, James Scuffell, Rachel Burns, Milan Wiedemann et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

The coding of migration status in English General Practice data from 2011 to 2024

Lucinda Hiam, James Scuffell, Rachel Burns, Milan Wiedemann, Yamina Boukari, Arina Tamborska
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesMigration status is a determinant of health, but it is not routinely recorded in General Practice (GP) records. We explored the recording of migration-related SNOMED-CT codes (a structured clinical vocabulary used in GP records) over time in order to inform future research on migrants’ health using GP data. MethodWe used NHS England’s SNOMED Code Usage in Primary Care datasets from 2011/12 to 2023/24 within the opencodes R package to describe the use of SNOMED-CT codes relevant to migration. Codes were grouped into five codelists: 1) all migration-related codes, 2) country-of-birth codes, 3) immigration-legal-status codes, 4) asylum or refugee codes or 5) interpreter-related codes. We calculated the total and annual counts of recorded instances of any code within each codelist and for all SNOMED-CT codes and the annual percentages of migration-related codes compared to all SNOMED-CT code usage. ResultsFrom 2011/12 to 2023/24, there were over 30 million instances of 1118 migration-related SNOMED-CT codes being recorded in GP records. Migration coding increased over time, with a particularly sharp increase during the COVID-19 period. Whilst we also observed a similar trend for overall SNOMED-CT coding, the percentage of migration coding compared to overall SNOMED-CT code usage increased from 0.067% in 2011/12 to 0.082% in 2023/24. The most commonly recorded codes indicated the need for an interpreter and a main spoken language of Polish, Romanian or Urdu. Amongst all uses of country-of-birth codes, the five most common were India, Pakistan, Romania, Nigeria and China. The most common legal status codes were related to asylum or refugee status. ConclusionMigration coding has improved over time, particularly following COVID-19, indicating the feasibility of using GP records to research the health of migrants in England. However, there may be biases in the types of migrants who are coded by GP staff, which is important to consider when interpreting results.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
King's College London (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.