Using routinely-collected records to measure antidepressant exposure and response and to assess Treatment Resistant Depression

ObjectivesMany people with depression do not respond to antidepressants and our poor mechanistic understanding of antidepressant response has hampered efforts to personalise treatment. In this study, we aimed to develop novel measures of antidepressant treatment exposure and response by capitalising on the variety and volume of UK administrative records. MethodsWe identified cases of depression from national primary and secondary care records, and derived longitudinal antidepressant treatment episodes from national community dispensing data. We then produced several proxy measures of antidepressant response. We developed these methods in the Generation Scotland cohort (N = 21,000) and further applied them to national data linkage cohorts, such as the DataLoch databank, for validation. The derived measures of treatment response were used to identify those with Treatment Resistant Depression according to current guidelines (i.e., based on switches). ResultsSeveral proxy measures of antidepressant treatment response were identified, including switching, drug maintenance, and discontinuation. Of the Generation Scotland cohort, around 1,500 were diagnosed with depression and were treated with an antidepressant. Over 60% of these individuals switched antidepressant during treatment, and both within- and between-class switching were common features. Using proxy measures, we identified Treatment Resistant Depression in around 10% of cases, although this rate differed widely depending on the operational definition used. We describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of those defined as treatment resistant, and the consequences of each definition for subsequent health and wellbeing. ConclusionsLinked electronic records provide the opportunity to track antidepressant exposure and response longitudinally. Changes in treatment can provide new measures that help to better understand treatment resistance and maintenance. How these measures are used in defining outcomes such as Treatment Resistant Depression requires further exploration and standardization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i4.3291
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using routinely-collected records to measure antidepressant exposure and response and to assess Treatment Resistant Depression

Emily Ball, Matthew H. Iveson, Heather C. Whalley
International Journal for Population Data Science
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Using routinely-collected records to measure antidepressant exposure and response and to assess Treatment Resistant Depression

Emily Ball, Matthew H. Iveson, Heather C. Whalley
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesMany people with depression do not respond to antidepressants and our poor mechanistic understanding of antidepressant response has hampered efforts to personalise treatment. In this study, we aimed to develop novel measures of antidepressant treatment exposure and response by capitalising on the variety and volume of UK administrative records. MethodsWe identified cases of depression from national primary and secondary care records, and derived longitudinal antidepressant treatment episodes from national community dispensing data. We then produced several proxy measures of antidepressant response. We developed these methods in the Generation Scotland cohort (N = 21,000) and further applied them to national data linkage cohorts, such as the DataLoch databank, for validation. The derived measures of treatment response were used to identify those with Treatment Resistant Depression according to current guidelines (i.e., based on switches). ResultsSeveral proxy measures of antidepressant treatment response were identified, including switching, drug maintenance, and discontinuation. Of the Generation Scotland cohort, around 1,500 were diagnosed with depression and were treated with an antidepressant. Over 60% of these individuals switched antidepressant during treatment, and both within- and between-class switching were common features. Using proxy measures, we identified Treatment Resistant Depression in around 10% of cases, although this rate differed widely depending on the operational definition used. We describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of those defined as treatment resistant, and the consequences of each definition for subsequent health and wellbeing. ConclusionsLinked electronic records provide the opportunity to track antidepressant exposure and response longitudinally. Changes in treatment can provide new measures that help to better understand treatment resistance and maintenance. How these measures are used in defining outcomes such as Treatment Resistant Depression requires further exploration and standardization.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(4)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.