Transnational cocaine trafficking: multiple data sources for network construction

Mapping transnational cocaine flows remains challenging due to fragmented and unreliable datasets, limiting understanding of trafficking structures. To address this, we integrate two distinct sources–the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Individual Drug Seizures and the United States’ International Narcotics Control Strategy Reports–to construct and compare 9 years of global cocaine trafficking networks. Using social network analysis, we replicate and extend previous appraoches to assess how data integration mitigates or amplifies reportng biases. Our findings show that merging these datasets enhances network cohesion, identifies overlooked transit hubs, and clarifies countries’ roles in trafficking. However, dataset limitations and geopolitical biases distort observed flows, necessitating careful interpretation. We advocate for broader data supplementation, including regional intelligence briefs and local field reports, and recommend weighted and multiplex network approaches to better capture trafficking complexities and improve the empirical foundations of illicit drug flow research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Crime
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2025.2545822
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transnational cocaine trafficking: multiple data sources for network construction

Alberto Aziani, Phillip Screen
1 citations
Global Crime
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
4.20
article

Transnational cocaine trafficking: multiple data sources for network construction

Alberto Aziani, Phillip Screen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mapping transnational cocaine flows remains challenging due to fragmented and unreliable datasets, limiting understanding of trafficking structures. To address this, we integrate two distinct sources–the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Individual Drug Seizures and the United States’ International Narcotics Control Strategy Reports–to construct and compare 9 years of global cocaine trafficking networks. Using social network analysis, we replicate and extend previous appraoches to assess how data integration mitigates or amplifies reportng biases. Our findings show that merging these datasets enhances network cohesion, identifies overlooked transit hubs, and clarifies countries’ roles in trafficking. However, dataset limitations and geopolitical biases distort observed flows, necessitating careful interpretation. We advocate for broader data supplementation, including regional intelligence briefs and local field reports, and recommend weighted and multiplex network approaches to better capture trafficking complexities and improve the empirical foundations of illicit drug flow research.

Global Crime
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transnational cocaine trafficking: multiple data sources for network construction — Alberto Aziani, Phillip Screen · Global Crime (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS