Enhancing Photovoltaic Energy Output Predictions Using ANN and DNN: A Hyperparameter Optimization Approach

This study investigates the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and deep neural networks (DNNs) for estimating photovoltaic (PV) energy output, with a particular focus on hyperparameter tuning. Supervised regression for photovoltaic (PV) direct current power prediction was conducted using only sensor-based inputs (PanelTemp, Irradiance, AmbientTemp, Humidity), together with physically motivated-derived features (ΔT, IrradianceEff, IrradianceSq, Irradiance × ΔT). Samples acquired under very low irradiance (<50 W m−2) were excluded. Predictors were standardized with training-set statistics (z-score), and the target variable was modeled in log space to stabilize variance. A shallow artificial neural network (ANN; single hidden layer, widths {4–32}) was compared with deeper multilayer perceptrons (DNN; stacks {16 8}, {32 16}, {64 32}, {128 64}, {128 64 32}). Hyperparameters were selected with a grid search using validation mean squared error in log space with early stopping; Bayesian optimization was additionally applied to the ANN. Final models were retrained and evaluated on a held-out test set after inverse transformation to watts. Test performance was obtained as MSE, RMSE, MAE, R2, and MAPE for the ANN and DNN. Hence, superiority in absolute/squared error and explained variance was exhibited by the ANN, whereas lower relative error was achieved by the DNN with a marginal MAE advantage. Ablation studies showed that moderate depth can be beneficial (e.g., two-layer variants), and a simple bootstrap ensemble improved robustness. In summary, the ANN demonstrated superior performance in terms of absolute-error accuracy, whereas the DNN exhibited better consistency with relative-error accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174564
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Photovoltaic Energy Output Predictions Using ANN and DNN: A Hyperparameter Optimization Approach

Atıl Emre Coşgun
1 citations
Energies
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
2.48
article

Enhancing Photovoltaic Energy Output Predictions Using ANN and DNN: A Hyperparameter Optimization Approach

Atıl Emre Coşgun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and deep neural networks (DNNs) for estimating photovoltaic (PV) energy output, with a particular focus on hyperparameter tuning. Supervised regression for photovoltaic (PV) direct current power prediction was conducted using only sensor-based inputs (PanelTemp, Irradiance, AmbientTemp, Humidity), together with physically motivated-derived features (ΔT, IrradianceEff, IrradianceSq, Irradiance × ΔT). Samples acquired under very low irradiance (<50 W m−2) were excluded. Predictors were standardized with training-set statistics (z-score), and the target variable was modeled in log space to stabilize variance. A shallow artificial neural network (ANN; single hidden layer, widths {4–32}) was compared with deeper multilayer perceptrons (DNN; stacks {16 8}, {32 16}, {64 32}, {128 64}, {128 64 32}). Hyperparameters were selected with a grid search using validation mean squared error in log space with early stopping; Bayesian optimization was additionally applied to the ANN. Final models were retrained and evaluated on a held-out test set after inverse transformation to watts. Test performance was obtained as MSE, RMSE, MAE, R2, and MAPE for the ANN and DNN. Hence, superiority in absolute/squared error and explained variance was exhibited by the ANN, whereas lower relative error was achieved by the DNN with a marginal MAE advantage. Ablation studies showed that moderate depth can be beneficial (e.g., two-layer variants), and a simple bootstrap ensemble improved robustness. In summary, the ANN demonstrated superior performance in terms of absolute-error accuracy, whereas the DNN exhibited better consistency with relative-error accuracy.

EnergiesVol. 18(17)
Aksaray University (TR)
Aksaray Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.