A Comparative Analysis of Early Ventilator Mechanics in COVID-19 vs. Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Single-Center ED-Based Cohort Study

<b>Background and Aim</b>: Mechanical ventilatory support is often required in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, early differences in ventilatory mechanics and severity scores between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients remain unclear. This study aimed to compare respiratory parameters and clinical severity scores in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients managed in the emergency department (ED) and evaluate their association with in-hospital mortality. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients with ARDS (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> < 300 mmHg) who received mechanical ventilation in the ED were included. Ventilator parameters and clinical severity scores (SOFA, APACHE II, PSI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index) were recorded at the 120th minute after intubation. Patients were categorized as COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 ARDS, and outcomes were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. <b>Results:</b> A total of 70 patients were enrolled (32 COVID-19, 38 non-COVID). Plateau pressure, driving pressure, and PEEP were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients, while compliance was without statistical significance. Overall, in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the COVID-19 (53.1%) and non-COVID-19 groups (71.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.12). Mechanical power (21.6 vs. 16.8 J/min, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (6 vs. 5.5, <i>p</i> = 0.02) were significantly higher in non-survivors across the full cohort. Among clinical scores, SOFA was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and APACHE II was significantly higher in non-survivors within the COVID-19 subgroup (<i>p</i> = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, mechanical power and Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> COVID-19 patients with ARDS exhibited higher early ventilatory pressures than non-COVID-19 patients, yet early respiratory mechanics were not independently associated with mortality. Mechanical power and Charlson Comorbidity Index were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. These findings underscore the need to consider both ventilatory load and systemic health status in early outcome assessments of ARDS patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172139
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Early Ventilator Mechanics in COVID-19 vs. Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Single-Center ED-Based Cohort Study

Sami Eksert, Harun Yıldırım, Murtaza Kaya, Mehmet Toprak et al.
Healthcare
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

A Comparative Analysis of Early Ventilator Mechanics in COVID-19 vs. Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Single-Center ED-Based Cohort Study

Sami Eksert, Harun Yıldırım, Murtaza Kaya, Mehmet Toprak, Mehmed Ulu, Ceyda Nur Irk
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Aim</b>: Mechanical ventilatory support is often required in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, early differences in ventilatory mechanics and severity scores between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients remain unclear. This study aimed to compare respiratory parameters and clinical severity scores in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients managed in the emergency department (ED) and evaluate their association with in-hospital mortality. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients with ARDS (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> < 300 mmHg) who received mechanical ventilation in the ED were included. Ventilator parameters and clinical severity scores (SOFA, APACHE II, PSI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index) were recorded at the 120th minute after intubation. Patients were categorized as COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 ARDS, and outcomes were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. <b>Results:</b> A total of 70 patients were enrolled (32 COVID-19, 38 non-COVID). Plateau pressure, driving pressure, and PEEP were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients, while compliance was without statistical significance. Overall, in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the COVID-19 (53.1%) and non-COVID-19 groups (71.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.12). Mechanical power (21.6 vs. 16.8 J/min, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (6 vs. 5.5, <i>p</i> = 0.02) were significantly higher in non-survivors across the full cohort. Among clinical scores, SOFA was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and APACHE II was significantly higher in non-survivors within the COVID-19 subgroup (<i>p</i> = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, mechanical power and Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> COVID-19 patients with ARDS exhibited higher early ventilatory pressures than non-COVID-19 patients, yet early respiratory mechanics were not independently associated with mortality. Mechanical power and Charlson Comorbidity Index were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. These findings underscore the need to consider both ventilatory load and systemic health status in early outcome assessments of ARDS patients.

HealthcareVol. 13(17)
University of Health Science (KH), Adıyaman University (TR), Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR), Kutahya Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi, University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.