A comparative study of the efficacy of an ultra-picosecond laser versus an ultra-pulsed CO2 laser in the treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum

Both laser therapies were effective in treating XP. However, the ultra-picosecond laser demonstrated superior safety, with fewer complications and lower recurrence rates, despite requiring more treatment sessions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Translational Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62347/detb5846
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of the efficacy of an ultra-picosecond laser versus an ultra-pulsed CO2 laser in the treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum

Jing Peng
4 links
American Journal of Translational Research
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

A comparative study of the efficacy of an ultra-picosecond laser versus an ultra-pulsed CO2 laser in the treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum

Jing Peng
article en

Abstract

Both laser therapies were effective in treating XP. However, the ultra-picosecond laser demonstrated superior safety, with fewer complications and lower recurrence rates, despite requiring more treatment sessions.

American Journal of Translational ResearchVol. 17(8)
Wuhan No.1 Hospital (CN), Wuhan No. 7 Hospital (CN), Wuhan No.9 Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.