Wind Veer and Speed in Turbulent Ekman Flow–Part II: Comparison to LES for Atmospheric Reynolds Numbers

Abstract The atmospheric boundary layer is characterized by a logarithmic increase in wind speed within the surface layer and a turning of the wind vector aloft. The simplest canonical configuration featuring both a logarithmic layer and wind turning is Ekman flow. A formulation of the mean velocity profile was derived from scaling considerations and calibrated using direct numerical simulation (DNS) in Part I of this work. Here, we explore the extrapolation of this formulation to atmospheric Reynolds numbers ( Re ) using large-eddy simulation (LES). Theoretical profiles of the wind vector are compared to LES results at intermediate Re , which require consideration of viscous effects along with modifications to the standard bottom boundary condition. A grid convergence analysis shows that LES data converge towards the theoretical profiles for intermediate and high Re . The LES thus confirms that (i) the spanwise velocity scales as $$\left. Re_\tau \right. ^{-1}$$ , where $$Re_\tau $$ is the friction Reynolds number, and (ii) one third of the wind veer is confined to the surface layer. Such agreement between the theoretical formulation and LES data increases confidence in the underlying scaling assumptions, reinforcing the utility of the theoretical profiles as a reference for intermediate and a quasi-reference for both idealized simulation and field observation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-025-00933-w
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wind Veer and Speed in Turbulent Ekman Flow–Part II: Comparison to LES for Atmospheric Reynolds Numbers

Hauke Wurps, Gerald Steinfeld, Cedrick Ansorge
Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

Wind Veer and Speed in Turbulent Ekman Flow–Part II: Comparison to LES for Atmospheric Reynolds Numbers

Hauke Wurps, Gerald Steinfeld, Cedrick Ansorge
article en

Abstract

Abstract The atmospheric boundary layer is characterized by a logarithmic increase in wind speed within the surface layer and a turning of the wind vector aloft. The simplest canonical configuration featuring both a logarithmic layer and wind turning is Ekman flow. A formulation of the mean velocity profile was derived from scaling considerations and calibrated using direct numerical simulation (DNS) in Part I of this work. Here, we explore the extrapolation of this formulation to atmospheric Reynolds numbers ( Re ) using large-eddy simulation (LES). Theoretical profiles of the wind vector are compared to LES results at intermediate Re , which require consideration of viscous effects along with modifications to the standard bottom boundary condition. A grid convergence analysis shows that LES data converge towards the theoretical profiles for intermediate and high Re . The LES thus confirms that (i) the spanwise velocity scales as $$\left. Re_\tau \right. ^{-1}$$ , where $$Re_\tau $$ is the friction Reynolds number, and (ii) one third of the wind veer is confined to the surface layer. Such agreement between the theoretical formulation and LES data increases confidence in the underlying scaling assumptions, reinforcing the utility of the theoretical profiles as a reference for intermediate and a quasi-reference for both idealized simulation and field observation.

Boundary-Layer MeteorologyVol. 191(9)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems (DE)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, Freie Universität Berlin, Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.