Optimization of 16S RNA Sequencing and Evaluation of Metagenomic Analysis with Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing has, for several years, been the main means of identifying bacterial and archaeal species. Low-throughput Sanger sequencing is often used for the detection and identification of microbial species, but this technique has several limitations. The use of high-throughput sequencers may be a good alternative to improve patient identification, especially for polyclonal infections and management. Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq are free, high-throughput tools providing a very rapid and accurate classification for metagenomic analyses. However, Kraken 2 can present false-positive results relative to KrakenUniq, which can be limiting in hospital settings requiring high levels of accuracy. The aim of this study was to establish an alternative next-generation sequencing technique to replace Sanger sequencing and to confirm that KrakenUniq is an excellent analysis tool that does not present false results relative to Kraken 2. <b>Methods</b>: DNA was extracted from reference bacterial samples for Laboratory Quality Controls (QCMDs) and the V2-V3 and V3-V4 regions of the 16S ribosomal gene were amplified. Amplified products were sequenced with the Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing protocol with minor modifications to adapt and sequence an Illumina 16S library with a small 500-cycle nano-flow cell. The raw files (Fastq) were analyzed on a commercial Smartgene platform for comparison with Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq results. KrakenUniq was used with a standard bacterial database and with the 16S-specific Silva138, RDP11.5, and Greengenes 13.5 databases. <b>Results</b>: Seven of the eight (87.5%) QCMDs were correctly sequenced and identified by Sanger sequencing. The remaining QCMD, QCMD6, could not be identified through Sanger sequencing. All QCMDs were correctly sequenced and identified by MiSeq with the commercial Smartgene analysis platform. QCMD6 contained two bacteria, <i>Acinetobacter</i> and <i>Klebsiella</i>. KrakenUniq identification results were identical to those of Smartgene, whereas Kraken 2 yielded 25% false-positive results. <b>Conclusions</b>: If Sanger identification fails, MiSeq with a small nano-flow cell is a very good alternative for the identification of bacterial species. KrakenUniq is a free, fast, and easy-to-use tool for identifying and classifying bacterial infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15172175
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of 16S RNA Sequencing and Evaluation of Metagenomic Analysis with Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq

Cécile Fernand-Laurent, Stéphanie Marque Juillet, Nasserdine Papa Mze, Solen Daugabel et al.
Diagnostics
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Optimization of 16S RNA Sequencing and Evaluation of Metagenomic Analysis with Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq

Cécile Fernand-Laurent, Stéphanie Marque Juillet, Nasserdine Papa Mze, Solen Daugabel, Olfa Zanzouri, Sonnentrucker Maxence
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing has, for several years, been the main means of identifying bacterial and archaeal species. Low-throughput Sanger sequencing is often used for the detection and identification of microbial species, but this technique has several limitations. The use of high-throughput sequencers may be a good alternative to improve patient identification, especially for polyclonal infections and management. Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq are free, high-throughput tools providing a very rapid and accurate classification for metagenomic analyses. However, Kraken 2 can present false-positive results relative to KrakenUniq, which can be limiting in hospital settings requiring high levels of accuracy. The aim of this study was to establish an alternative next-generation sequencing technique to replace Sanger sequencing and to confirm that KrakenUniq is an excellent analysis tool that does not present false results relative to Kraken 2. <b>Methods</b>: DNA was extracted from reference bacterial samples for Laboratory Quality Controls (QCMDs) and the V2-V3 and V3-V4 regions of the 16S ribosomal gene were amplified. Amplified products were sequenced with the Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing protocol with minor modifications to adapt and sequence an Illumina 16S library with a small 500-cycle nano-flow cell. The raw files (Fastq) were analyzed on a commercial Smartgene platform for comparison with Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq results. KrakenUniq was used with a standard bacterial database and with the 16S-specific Silva138, RDP11.5, and Greengenes 13.5 databases. <b>Results</b>: Seven of the eight (87.5%) QCMDs were correctly sequenced and identified by Sanger sequencing. The remaining QCMD, QCMD6, could not be identified through Sanger sequencing. All QCMDs were correctly sequenced and identified by MiSeq with the commercial Smartgene analysis platform. QCMD6 contained two bacteria, <i>Acinetobacter</i> and <i>Klebsiella</i>. KrakenUniq identification results were identical to those of Smartgene, whereas Kraken 2 yielded 25% false-positive results. <b>Conclusions</b>: If Sanger identification fails, MiSeq with a small nano-flow cell is a very good alternative for the identification of bacterial species. KrakenUniq is a free, fast, and easy-to-use tool for identifying and classifying bacterial infections.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(17)
Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Paris-Est Sup (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Versailles (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.