Mitigating propensity score model misspecification with multiply robust weights when leveraging external data

Propensity score-integrated Bayesian dynamic borrowing methods offer an effective approach for covariate adjustment when using external data to augment randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, identifying the correct propensity score model can be challenging due to unknown treatment selection processes, potentially leading to model misspecification and biased estimates. To improve robustness to model misspecification, we propose an innovative Bayesian inference procedure that incorporates multiply robust weights into the construction of informative power priors. Specifically, we specify a set of candidate propensity score models to derive multiply robust weights, balancing covariates between the current data and external data. The weighted external data is then incorporated into the analysis using a Bayesian power prior method. We further extend this approach to leverage multiple external datasets. Simulation studies indicate that when the set of postulated propensity score models include a correctly specified model, the proposed method achieves desirable operating characteristics, including low bias, low root mean squared error (RMSE), controlled type I error rate at the predetermined nominal level, and high statistical power. This method also provides a robust strategy for researchers who may have a difficult time developing or selecting a single propensity score model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2025.2547593
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating propensity score model misspecification with multiply robust weights when leveraging external data

Yongfu Yu, Guoyou Qin, Jinmei Chen
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Mitigating propensity score model misspecification with multiply robust weights when leveraging external data

Yongfu Yu, Guoyou Qin, Jinmei Chen
article en

Abstract

Propensity score-integrated Bayesian dynamic borrowing methods offer an effective approach for covariate adjustment when using external data to augment randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, identifying the correct propensity score model can be challenging due to unknown treatment selection processes, potentially leading to model misspecification and biased estimates. To improve robustness to model misspecification, we propose an innovative Bayesian inference procedure that incorporates multiply robust weights into the construction of informative power priors. Specifically, we specify a set of candidate propensity score models to derive multiply robust weights, balancing covariates between the current data and external data. The weighted external data is then incorporated into the analysis using a Bayesian power prior method. We further extend this approach to leverage multiple external datasets. Simulation studies indicate that when the set of postulated propensity score models include a correctly specified model, the proposed method achieves desirable operating characteristics, including low bias, low root mean squared error (RMSE), controlled type I error rate at the predetermined nominal level, and high statistical power. This method also provides a robust strategy for researchers who may have a difficult time developing or selecting a single propensity score model.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Fudan University (CN), Ministry of Education (KR)
Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.