Opportunities and computational challenges in large-scale whole genome sequencing data analysis

Genomic selection has been used in animal breeding for c. 15 years and continues to be an important tool in predicting genetic merit in livestock populations. The dairy cattle industry was the first to adopt genomic selection, initially based on some 50K SNP arrays for thousands of animals. Later advances in genome-scanning technologies have enabled inexpensive genotyping and sequencing, leading to wider adoption, and constantly increasing amounts of genomic data, both as to the number of genotyped animals and variants genotyped per animal. Full sequence data are expected to supersede SNP chips in the coming years. We review the methods and computational approaches used with sequence data and the impact of the methods and model assumptions on genomic prediction accuracy. The modeling, development, and applicability of these methods to sequence data are discussed as well as the computational resources required. Sequence data should in principle provide full information of genetic variability, which should lead to higher prediction accuracy. In practice there is limited evidence of additional benefit from using sequence data over medium or high-density SNP panels. This is particularly true for small effective population sizes (Ne) such as cattle populations, where animals within a breed have many common ancestors and thus longer chromosome segments with high linkage disequilibrium (LD) accurately trackable with a relatively small number of markers. A population with a small Ne has long haplotype blocks, from 1 to 5 Mb, making it hard to identify casual variants within blocks. However, in major cattle breeds a medium-density SNP panel is sufficient to tag the blocks themselves, and prediction with large datasets is highly accurate. Clearly, sequence data should not be used directly for genomic prediction, but for identifying putative causal variants to improve the accuracy and stability of subsequent predictions. We show that the best strategy to deal with any large data with high SNP densities is to use only a subset of (important) markers and determine the most appropriate model for exploiting the preselected variants in the genomic evaluation. Novel prediction methods that subset trait-specific informative markers could offer the advantage of using sequence data by potentially linking individuals through underlying functional variants rather than simply through shared haplotype blocks inherited from ancestors. Further research is required to clarify this aspect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf292
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities and computational challenges in large-scale whole genome sequencing data analysis

Ismo Strandén, Hafedh Ben Zaabza, Beatriz C. D. Cuyabano, I. Misztal et al.
1 citations
Journal of Animal Science
Gene expression and cancer classification
0.81
article

Opportunities and computational challenges in large-scale whole genome sequencing data analysis

Ismo Strandén, Hafedh Ben Zaabza, Beatriz C. D. Cuyabano, I. Misztal, Cedric Gondro, Daniela A. L. Lourenco, Mohammad Ferdosi, Mahesh Neupane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Genomic selection has been used in animal breeding for c. 15 years and continues to be an important tool in predicting genetic merit in livestock populations. The dairy cattle industry was the first to adopt genomic selection, initially based on some 50K SNP arrays for thousands of animals. Later advances in genome-scanning technologies have enabled inexpensive genotyping and sequencing, leading to wider adoption, and constantly increasing amounts of genomic data, both as to the number of genotyped animals and variants genotyped per animal. Full sequence data are expected to supersede SNP chips in the coming years. We review the methods and computational approaches used with sequence data and the impact of the methods and model assumptions on genomic prediction accuracy. The modeling, development, and applicability of these methods to sequence data are discussed as well as the computational resources required. Sequence data should in principle provide full information of genetic variability, which should lead to higher prediction accuracy. In practice there is limited evidence of additional benefit from using sequence data over medium or high-density SNP panels. This is particularly true for small effective population sizes (Ne) such as cattle populations, where animals within a breed have many common ancestors and thus longer chromosome segments with high linkage disequilibrium (LD) accurately trackable with a relatively small number of markers. A population with a small Ne has long haplotype blocks, from 1 to 5 Mb, making it hard to identify casual variants within blocks. However, in major cattle breeds a medium-density SNP panel is sufficient to tag the blocks themselves, and prediction with large datasets is highly accurate. Clearly, sequence data should not be used directly for genomic prediction, but for identifying putative causal variants to improve the accuracy and stability of subsequent predictions. We show that the best strategy to deal with any large data with high SNP densities is to use only a subset of (important) markers and determine the most appropriate model for exploiting the preselected variants in the genomic evaluation. Novel prediction methods that subset trait-specific informative markers could offer the advantage of using sequence data by potentially linking individuals through underlying functional variants rather than simply through shared haplotype blocks inherited from ancestors. Further research is required to clarify this aspect.

Journal of Animal Science
United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of Georgia (US), AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (US), Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative (FR), Michigan State University (US), University of New England (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Gene expression and cancer classification
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.