Evaluating AI Responses to Postoperative Questions in Mohs Reconstruction

Patients frequently ask questions after Mohs facial reconstruction. AI tools, particularly large language models (LLMs), may optimize this communication.We evaluated four LLMs-Claude AI, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini-on responses to postoperative questions, hypothesizing variation in quality, accuracy, comprehensiveness, and readability.Prospective observational study following STROBE guidelines.A total of 31 common postoperative questions were created. Each was submitted to all four LLMs using a standardized prompt. Responses were evaluated by blinded facial plastic surgeons using validated scoring tools (EQIP, Likert scales, readability formulas). IRB exemption was granted.Claude AI outperformed others in quality (EQIP: 90.3), accuracy (4.55/5), and comprehensiveness (4.60/5). All LLMs exceeded the recommended 6th-grade reading level.LLMs show potential for supporting postoperative communication, but variation in readability and content depth highlights the continued need for physician oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2689-2685
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating AI Responses to Postoperative Questions in Mohs Reconstruction

Areeb Shah, Collin Chen, Lisa M. Velez‐Velez, Rohun Gupta et al.
Facial Plastic Surgery
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating AI Responses to Postoperative Questions in Mohs Reconstruction

Areeb Shah, Collin Chen, Lisa M. Velez‐Velez, Rohun Gupta, Kevin Chen, Luke Schwetschenau
article en

Abstract

Patients frequently ask questions after Mohs facial reconstruction. AI tools, particularly large language models (LLMs), may optimize this communication.We evaluated four LLMs-Claude AI, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini-on responses to postoperative questions, hypothesizing variation in quality, accuracy, comprehensiveness, and readability.Prospective observational study following STROBE guidelines.A total of 31 common postoperative questions were created. Each was submitted to all four LLMs using a standardized prompt. Responses were evaluated by blinded facial plastic surgeons using validated scoring tools (EQIP, Likert scales, readability formulas). IRB exemption was granted.Claude AI outperformed others in quality (EQIP: 90.3), accuracy (4.55/5), and comprehensiveness (4.60/5). All LLMs exceeded the recommended 6th-grade reading level.LLMs show potential for supporting postoperative communication, but variation in readability and content depth highlights the continued need for physician oversight.

Facial Plastic Surgery
Saint Louis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating AI Responses to Postoperative Questions in Mohs Reconstruction — Areeb Shah, Collin Chen, et al. · Facial Plastic Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS