Comparison of HILDA Survey Estimates With the 2006–2021 Censuses

ABSTRACT Issue The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey has provided researchers and policymakers with invaluable insights into Australian life for more than two decades. Nevertheless, nonresponse, attrition and shifts in population coverage can affect how representative the sample is over time. Methods We evaluate the HILDA Survey's representativeness by comparing its estimates against those from the Census across four time periods and four age groups. Findings We find strong alignment across many of the variables examined. For the most part, observed differences can be explained by differences in the questions asked, recall periods or different collection methodologies. Recent immigrants are a concern as they can only join the sample by living with a HILDA household or be included via a top‐up sample. Sizeable differences are identified in the proportion of immigrants aged 15–24 and 25–44 in particular, which were corrected in 2011 with the addition of a general top‐up sample. Implications We conclude that the HILDA Survey is largely representative of the Australian population and note that the coverage of recent immigrants is in the process of being addressed. Additional immigrant‐specific samples are being added in 2024 and 2025 and regular immigrant sample top‐ups are needed thereafter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Economic Review
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.70028
Primary Topic
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of HILDA Survey Estimates With the 2006–2021 Censuses

Nicole Watson, Taylor Ey
Australian Economic Review
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
article

Comparison of HILDA Survey Estimates With the 2006–2021 Censuses

Nicole Watson, Taylor Ey
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Issue The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey has provided researchers and policymakers with invaluable insights into Australian life for more than two decades. Nevertheless, nonresponse, attrition and shifts in population coverage can affect how representative the sample is over time. Methods We evaluate the HILDA Survey's representativeness by comparing its estimates against those from the Census across four time periods and four age groups. Findings We find strong alignment across many of the variables examined. For the most part, observed differences can be explained by differences in the questions asked, recall periods or different collection methodologies. Recent immigrants are a concern as they can only join the sample by living with a HILDA household or be included via a top‐up sample. Sizeable differences are identified in the proportion of immigrants aged 15–24 and 25–44 in particular, which were corrected in 2011 with the addition of a general top‐up sample. Implications We conclude that the HILDA Survey is largely representative of the Australian population and note that the coverage of recent immigrants is in the process of being addressed. Additional immigrant‐specific samples are being added in 2024 and 2025 and regular immigrant sample top‐ups are needed thereafter.

Australian Economic ReviewVol. 59(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Australian Government, Department of Social Services, Australian Government, University of Melbourne
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of HILDA Survey Estimates With the 2006–2021 Censuses — Nicole Watson, Taylor Ey · Australian Economic Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS