Beyond ESG: Reconstructing Corporate Pseudo-Social Responsibility Governance for Just Transition

This paper critiques the proliferation of corporate pseudo-social responsibility enabled by fragmented ESG frameworks. We identify three manifestations-green hypocrisy, labor rights hypocrisy, and structural hypocrisy-driven by institutional voids in the PORE model. Proposing a paradigm shift toward Just Transition, the study constructs a just sustainability framework integrating environmental justice, institutional theory, and stakeholder rights. This framework repositions corporations as transition risk managers, capacity-building platforms, and institutional entrepreneurs. We further design a multi-level governance system combining regulatory reinforcement, organizational integrity cultivation, and assessment paradigm innovation. The research contributes a critical pathway to transcend ESG’s limitations and achieve ecologically grounded, socially equitable corporate sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific journal of economics and management research.
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/xfcm6132
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond ESG: Reconstructing Corporate Pseudo-Social Responsibility Governance for Just Transition

Tianyi Qiao
Scientific journal of economics and management research.
Community Development and Social Impact
article

Beyond ESG: Reconstructing Corporate Pseudo-Social Responsibility Governance for Just Transition

Tianyi Qiao
article en

Abstract

This paper critiques the proliferation of corporate pseudo-social responsibility enabled by fragmented ESG frameworks. We identify three manifestations-green hypocrisy, labor rights hypocrisy, and structural hypocrisy-driven by institutional voids in the PORE model. Proposing a paradigm shift toward Just Transition, the study constructs a just sustainability framework integrating environmental justice, institutional theory, and stakeholder rights. This framework repositions corporations as transition risk managers, capacity-building platforms, and institutional entrepreneurs. We further design a multi-level governance system combining regulatory reinforcement, organizational integrity cultivation, and assessment paradigm innovation. The research contributes a critical pathway to transcend ESG’s limitations and achieve ecologically grounded, socially equitable corporate sustainability.

Scientific journal of economics and management research.Vol. 7(8)
Northeastern University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond ESG: Reconstructing Corporate Pseudo-Social Responsibility Governance for Just Transition — Tianyi Qiao · Scientific journal of economics and management research. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS