Evolution tendencies of Chinese underwater cultural heritage legislation in the new era: a legislative history study of China’s 2022 revision

Considering the fast development of Chinese deep-sea archaeology and the pressing situation of underwater cultural heritage (UCH), China’s legislation for UCH was revised again in 2022. This revision underwent a nine-year-long, arduous drafting process, but it has received little scholarly attention. This study explores the history of the revision via the comparison of four relevant legal documents to show the evolution of Chinese UCH legislation. The issues of most concern for China in the revision are the distribution of UCH responsibilities among different institutions, public participation, protection measures and international cooperation regarding UCH. In terms of the distance between Chinese legislation and the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, three different types of evolution tendencies appeared in the revision history. First, China’s legislation moved continuously closer to the Convention, and this tendency is reflected in the issues of public participation, international cooperation and the distribution of UCH responsibilities. Second, with respect to protection measures, China’s law showed a hesitant tendency, as China’s legislation once moved closer to the Convention but eventually retrogressed. Third, with respect to the definition and ownership-based jurisdiction of UCH, China’s legislation did not make substantial changes and remained consistently far from the Convention. To explain the dynamic and arduous revision history, influencing factors in the “pull” and “push” directions are identified. The shift from a state-led protection model to an integrated model and the international context pushed China closer to the Convention, while the consideration of economic development and institutional conflicts pulled China back. Consequently, China ultimately made a compromise in 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1571162
Primary Topic
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution tendencies of Chinese underwater cultural heritage legislation in the new era: a legislative history study of China’s 2022 revision

Qian Li, Xuewei Qi
Frontiers in Marine Science
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
article

Evolution tendencies of Chinese underwater cultural heritage legislation in the new era: a legislative history study of China’s 2022 revision

Qian Li, Xuewei Qi
article en

Abstract

Considering the fast development of Chinese deep-sea archaeology and the pressing situation of underwater cultural heritage (UCH), China’s legislation for UCH was revised again in 2022. This revision underwent a nine-year-long, arduous drafting process, but it has received little scholarly attention. This study explores the history of the revision via the comparison of four relevant legal documents to show the evolution of Chinese UCH legislation. The issues of most concern for China in the revision are the distribution of UCH responsibilities among different institutions, public participation, protection measures and international cooperation regarding UCH. In terms of the distance between Chinese legislation and the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, three different types of evolution tendencies appeared in the revision history. First, China’s legislation moved continuously closer to the Convention, and this tendency is reflected in the issues of public participation, international cooperation and the distribution of UCH responsibilities. Second, with respect to protection measures, China’s law showed a hesitant tendency, as China’s legislation once moved closer to the Convention but eventually retrogressed. Third, with respect to the definition and ownership-based jurisdiction of UCH, China’s legislation did not make substantial changes and remained consistently far from the Convention. To explain the dynamic and arduous revision history, influencing factors in the “pull” and “push” directions are identified. The shift from a state-led protection model to an integrated model and the international context pushed China closer to the Convention, while the consideration of economic development and institutional conflicts pulled China back. Consequently, China ultimately made a compromise in 2022.

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 12
Ocean University of China (CN)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Postdoctoral Innovation Project of Shandong Province, Cultural Heritage Administration, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.