Efficacies of cooking and depuration for reducing current-use pesticide residues in wild-caught giant mud crabs (Scylla serrata)

Introduction Pesticides can be transported into estuaries via spray drift, ground water contamination and surface runoff. Increasing climatic variability and global pesticide use are likely to increase the exposure of harvested estuarine species, and therefore seafood consumers, to agrichemicals. Post-harvest processing strategies present opportunities to reduce pesticide residues in seafood and so mitigate consumer exposure. Materials and methods We evaluated the efficacies of thermal processing (cooking) and depuration (holding individuals in clean flow-through seawater) for reducing pesticide residues in wild-caught giant mud crab ( Scylla serrata ) edible tissues (flesh and brown meat (i.e. hepatopancreas and gonads)). Pesticide residues were detected in 82% of assessed crabs, with five analytes quantified (cyprodinil, diuron, imidacloprid, propargite and triazophos). Results Correlative analyses revealed cooking at ~82°C for 2 min 100-g –1 body mass reduced all pesticide concentrations (and the total residues) in both tissues by 7–99%—except for cyprodinil (51% increase). Imidacloprid residues in crab flesh were reduced (by 81%) after six days of depuration, with complete elimination after 12 days. While a human health-risk assessment identified that the concentrations of pesticide residues in crab tissues posed no negative health effects to seafood consumers, the data support post-harvest processing methods for mitigating consumer exposure. Discussion These findings do not constitute health advice regarding post-harvest possessing methods for reducing contaminants in seafood, but rather highlight the potential utility of the methods assessed for achieving this objective and the broader need for ongoing pesticide surveillance of Australian seafood. Food safety regulation should consider establishing maximum residue limits for seafood, with consideration of consumption preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1624922
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacies of cooking and depuration for reducing current-use pesticide residues in wild-caught giant mud crabs (Scylla serrata)

Curtis Champion, Kirsten Benkendorff, Matt Kenyon Broadhurst, Benjamin C. T. Gray et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Marine Science
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

Efficacies of cooking and depuration for reducing current-use pesticide residues in wild-caught giant mud crabs (Scylla serrata)

Curtis Champion, Kirsten Benkendorff, Matt Kenyon Broadhurst, Benjamin C. T. Gray, Melinda A. Coleman
article en

Abstract

Introduction Pesticides can be transported into estuaries via spray drift, ground water contamination and surface runoff. Increasing climatic variability and global pesticide use are likely to increase the exposure of harvested estuarine species, and therefore seafood consumers, to agrichemicals. Post-harvest processing strategies present opportunities to reduce pesticide residues in seafood and so mitigate consumer exposure. Materials and methods We evaluated the efficacies of thermal processing (cooking) and depuration (holding individuals in clean flow-through seawater) for reducing pesticide residues in wild-caught giant mud crab ( Scylla serrata ) edible tissues (flesh and brown meat (i.e. hepatopancreas and gonads)). Pesticide residues were detected in 82% of assessed crabs, with five analytes quantified (cyprodinil, diuron, imidacloprid, propargite and triazophos). Results Correlative analyses revealed cooking at ~82°C for 2 min 100-g –1 body mass reduced all pesticide concentrations (and the total residues) in both tissues by 7–99%—except for cyprodinil (51% increase). Imidacloprid residues in crab flesh were reduced (by 81%) after six days of depuration, with complete elimination after 12 days. While a human health-risk assessment identified that the concentrations of pesticide residues in crab tissues posed no negative health effects to seafood consumers, the data support post-harvest processing methods for mitigating consumer exposure. Discussion These findings do not constitute health advice regarding post-harvest possessing methods for reducing contaminants in seafood, but rather highlight the potential utility of the methods assessed for achieving this objective and the broader need for ongoing pesticide surveillance of Australian seafood. Food safety regulation should consider establishing maximum residue limits for seafood, with consideration of consumption preferences.

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 12
The University of Queensland (AU), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), Southern Cross University (AU)
Australian Government, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Southern Cross University, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.