The Why and How of Abolishing the Fractional Reserve Banking System: A Modest Proposal<sup>*</sup>

This paper critiques the U.S. Federal Reserve’s institutional design and macro-financial results. Using statutory analysis, historical balance-sheet data, and comparisons with sovereign-money systems, we find that the Fed’s hybrid public-private structure channels monetary policy toward the profit goals of member banks rather than the broader economy. Interest-bearing money creation intensifies leverage cycles, concentrates wealth among financial asset-holders, and leaves taxpayers to fund repeated bailouts. We model a counterfactual full-reserve regime in which the Treasury issues debt-free sovereign money and commercial banks serve only as custodial intermediaries. The simulation indicates lower systemic risk, and steadier credit allocation. Getting rid of the Federal Reserve and putting the power to control the money supply back in the Treasury could make the economy more stable over the long run.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Economy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2025.168063
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Why and How of Abolishing the Fractional Reserve Banking System: A Modest Proposal*

Mark A. Ehlen, Prabuddha Sanyal
Modern Economy
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

The Why and How of Abolishing the Fractional Reserve Banking System: A Modest Proposal*

Mark A. Ehlen, Prabuddha Sanyal
article en

Abstract

This paper critiques the U.S. Federal Reserve’s institutional design and macro-financial results. Using statutory analysis, historical balance-sheet data, and comparisons with sovereign-money systems, we find that the Fed’s hybrid public-private structure channels monetary policy toward the profit goals of member banks rather than the broader economy. Interest-bearing money creation intensifies leverage cycles, concentrates wealth among financial asset-holders, and leaves taxpayers to fund repeated bailouts. We model a counterfactual full-reserve regime in which the Treasury issues debt-free sovereign money and commercial banks serve only as custodial intermediaries. The simulation indicates lower systemic risk, and steadier credit allocation. Getting rid of the Federal Reserve and putting the power to control the money supply back in the Treasury could make the economy more stable over the long run.

Modern EconomyVol. 16(08)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.