Correlation of surgical volume in gynecological cancer centers with the quality of ovarian cancer care

Surgical volume in ovarian cancer treatment has been discussed to influence survival. Completeness of staging in early and macroscopic complete resection in advanced ovarian cancer are indicators of treatment quality and surrogate parameters for outcome. This study examines their association with case volume in certified gynecological cancer centers. Certification audit data from ovarian cancer cases treated in 193 gynecological cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society between 2020 and 2022 were analyzed. In our study 3,881 patients with FIGO stage I-IIIA and 7,219 patients with FIGO stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer were included. Case volume thresholds of 10, 15, 20 and 25 annual cases per hospital were explored for both quality indicators. Higher-volume centers consistently performed complete surgical staging in FIGO stage I-IIIA ovarian cancer patients more frequently. For example, centers treating < 15 cases annually had a lower likelihood of complete staging (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69–0.98; p = 0.031). Macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 72.32–75.64% of FIGO stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer cases across all four thresholds. High-volume centers performed macroscopic complete resection about 2 percentage points more often. These data indicate that case volume of cancer centers is not necessarily an indicator for quality of treatment. Since certification audit data does not account for primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the inherent bias caused by differences in resection rates between these two treatment strategies must be acknowledged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06288-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation of surgical volume in gynecological cancer centers with the quality of ovarian cancer care

Jalid Sehouli, Olaf Ortmann, Johannes Bruns, Pauline Wimberger et al.
3 citations
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
5.09
article

Correlation of surgical volume in gynecological cancer centers with the quality of ovarian cancer care

Jalid Sehouli, Olaf Ortmann, Johannes Bruns, Pauline Wimberger, Rebecca Roth, Susanne Schüler‐Toprak, Christoph Kowalski, Matthias W. Beckmann, Birgit Klages
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Surgical volume in ovarian cancer treatment has been discussed to influence survival. Completeness of staging in early and macroscopic complete resection in advanced ovarian cancer are indicators of treatment quality and surrogate parameters for outcome. This study examines their association with case volume in certified gynecological cancer centers. Certification audit data from ovarian cancer cases treated in 193 gynecological cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society between 2020 and 2022 were analyzed. In our study 3,881 patients with FIGO stage I-IIIA and 7,219 patients with FIGO stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer were included. Case volume thresholds of 10, 15, 20 and 25 annual cases per hospital were explored for both quality indicators. Higher-volume centers consistently performed complete surgical staging in FIGO stage I-IIIA ovarian cancer patients more frequently. For example, centers treating < 15 cases annually had a lower likelihood of complete staging (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69–0.98; p = 0.031). Macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 72.32–75.64% of FIGO stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer cases across all four thresholds. High-volume centers performed macroscopic complete resection about 2 percentage points more often. These data indicate that case volume of cancer centers is not necessarily an indicator for quality of treatment. Since certification audit data does not account for primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the inherent bias caused by differences in resection rates between these two treatment strategies must be acknowledged.

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical OncologyVol. 151(8)
Fischer (Germany) (DE), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), German Cancer Society (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
5.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.