Comparing and Contrasting N-Back and Self-Directed Memory Selection, as Measures of Working Memory

Working memory (WM) is a fundamental cognitive function, yet different tasks may assess distinct aspects of WM. We investigated the relationship between self-directed selection from memory sets and performance on the N-back task. One hundred nine students participated in the study (57 females, 51 males, one other). The N-back s and self-directed memory task measures were significantly but modestly correlated ( r = .29), possibly because of a compressed (high) range of WM ability in our engineering student sample. Participants also played other games assessing cognitive speed, response inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. The gamified N-Back Task was significantly correlated with the gamified numerical Stroop task, whereas our gamified self-directed memory selection task was not. This raises the possibility that self-directed memory selection is a purer measure of working memory than the N-Back task, because there is less involvement of cognitive flexibility (as exemplified by the numerical Stroop task) in its performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251360708
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing and Contrasting N-Back and Self-Directed Memory Selection, as Measures of Working Memory

You Zhi Hu, Mark Chignell, Jianrong Wu, Zhaolin Xu et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Comparing and Contrasting N-Back and Self-Directed Memory Selection, as Measures of Working Memory

You Zhi Hu, Mark Chignell, Jianrong Wu, Zhaolin Xu, Y.-D. Zhou
article en

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a fundamental cognitive function, yet different tasks may assess distinct aspects of WM. We investigated the relationship between self-directed selection from memory sets and performance on the N-back task. One hundred nine students participated in the study (57 females, 51 males, one other). The N-back s and self-directed memory task measures were significantly but modestly correlated ( r = .29), possibly because of a compressed (high) range of WM ability in our engineering student sample. Participants also played other games assessing cognitive speed, response inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. The gamified N-Back Task was significantly correlated with the gamified numerical Stroop task, whereas our gamified self-directed memory selection task was not. This raises the possibility that self-directed memory selection is a purer measure of working memory than the N-Back task, because there is less involvement of cognitive flexibility (as exemplified by the numerical Stroop task) in its performance.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing and Contrasting N-Back and Self-Directed Memory Selection, as Measures of Working Memory — You Zhi Hu, Mark Chignell, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS