Investigating Cognitive Engagement from Training to Application Under Varied Workload Manipulations in Virtual Reality

This study examined how neural engagement differs between training and application under varied cognitive workload in a virtual-reality assembly task. Twenty-three participants completed four within-subject conditions (low vs. high intrinsic load and low vs. high extraneous load). We recorded three electroencephalography-derived engagement indicators: Cognitive Effort (parietal α/frontal θ), Sustained Attention (β/(α + θ)), and Integration & Execution (γ power). Changes in these indicators during learning were expected to reveal changes in engagement linked to unique cognitive resources recruited by workloads and phases of learning tasks. Analyses revealed a robust task phase effect: application activation exceeded training for Sustained Attention and Integration & Execution. Significant task phase workload condition interactions emerged for these indicators as well. Findings indicated that unguided application amplifies working-memory and integrative engagement and that this amplification depends on workload type. Our results inform the design of adaptive training systems monitoring phase-dependent neural engagement to optimize learning transfer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251363210
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Cognitive Engagement from Training to Application Under Varied Workload Manipulations in Virtual Reality

Joanna Lewis, Leanne Hirshfield, Christopher D. Wickens, Cara Spencer et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Investigating Cognitive Engagement from Training to Application Under Varied Workload Manipulations in Virtual Reality

Joanna Lewis, Leanne Hirshfield, Christopher D. Wickens, Cara Spencer, Francisco R. Ortega, Rebecca L. Pharmer, Benjamin A. Clegg, Lucas Plabst, Jalynn Blu Nicoly
article en

Abstract

This study examined how neural engagement differs between training and application under varied cognitive workload in a virtual-reality assembly task. Twenty-three participants completed four within-subject conditions (low vs. high intrinsic load and low vs. high extraneous load). We recorded three electroencephalography-derived engagement indicators: Cognitive Effort (parietal α/frontal θ), Sustained Attention (β/(α + θ)), and Integration & Execution (γ power). Changes in these indicators during learning were expected to reveal changes in engagement linked to unique cognitive resources recruited by workloads and phases of learning tasks. Analyses revealed a robust task phase effect: application activation exceeded training for Sustained Attention and Integration & Execution. Significant task phase workload condition interactions emerged for these indicators as well. Findings indicated that unguided application amplifies working-memory and integrative engagement and that this amplification depends on workload type. Our results inform the design of adaptive training systems monitoring phase-dependent neural engagement to optimize learning transfer.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), Montana State University (US), University of Northern Colorado (US), Colorado State University (US)
Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.