Transparency and Explainability in AI-Assisted Decision Making: Effects on Trust, Perceived Reliability, Confidence, and Ease of Understanding

System transparency plays a critical role in user trust and perceived reliability in human-AI decision making scenarios. However, there is no clear consensus on the optimal level of transparency needed for adequately calibrated trust in the system, influenced by the user’s perceived reliability of the AI, confidence in the AI, and ease of understanding of AI output. Participants ( n = 216) engaged in a decision-making task across four AI-assisted decision-making scenarios. Each participant was randomly assigned to one of three transparency levels: low, medium, and high. Results show that higher transparency levels improved trust (β = .667, p < .001), perceived reliability (β = .595, p < .001), confidence in the AI accuracy (β = .553, p < .001), and ease of understanding (β = 1.161, p < .001). These findings indicate that increasing the amount of information presented to the user increases understanding, trust, perceived reliability, and confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251369473
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparency and Explainability in AI-Assisted Decision Making: Effects on Trust, Perceived Reliability, Confidence, and Ease of Understanding

Kristin Weger, Virginia Sullivan
1 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Transparency and Explainability in AI-Assisted Decision Making: Effects on Trust, Perceived Reliability, Confidence, and Ease of Understanding

Kristin Weger, Virginia Sullivan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

System transparency plays a critical role in user trust and perceived reliability in human-AI decision making scenarios. However, there is no clear consensus on the optimal level of transparency needed for adequately calibrated trust in the system, influenced by the user’s perceived reliability of the AI, confidence in the AI, and ease of understanding of AI output. Participants ( n = 216) engaged in a decision-making task across four AI-assisted decision-making scenarios. Each participant was randomly assigned to one of three transparency levels: low, medium, and high. Results show that higher transparency levels improved trust (β = .667, p < .001), perceived reliability (β = .595, p < .001), confidence in the AI accuracy (β = .553, p < .001), and ease of understanding (β = 1.161, p < .001). These findings indicate that increasing the amount of information presented to the user increases understanding, trust, perceived reliability, and confidence.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.