Addressing data gaps in sustainability reporting: A benchmark dataset for greenhouse gas emission extraction

Reliable company-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data are essential for stakeholders addressing the climate crisis. However, existing datasets are often fragmented, inconsistent, and lack transparent methodologies, making it difficult to obtain reliable emissions data. To address this challenge, we present a gold standard dataset containing emission metrics extracted from 139 sustainability reports collected from company websites. This dataset acts as an intermediate step to validate and fine-tune models for large-scale extraction of emissions data from thousands of reports. We employ a Large Language Model (LLM)-powered extraction pipeline to automatically extract emissions metrics. These values are then independently assessed by two non-expert annotators. Reports with full agreement are directly considered gold standard, while discrepancies undergo expert review in two stages, with remaining disagreements resolved through in-person discussions. This structured process ensures high data quality while reducing reliance on experts. Our dataset serves as a benchmark for human and automated annotation, with significant reuse potential for information extraction tasks in sustainable finance as well as other downstream tasks such as greenwashing analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05664-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing data gaps in sustainability reporting: A benchmark dataset for greenhouse gas emission extraction

A. F. Steinberg, Andreas Dimmelmeier, Laia Domènech, Jacob Beck et al.
2 citations
Scientific Data
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
article

Addressing data gaps in sustainability reporting: A benchmark dataset for greenhouse gas emission extraction

A. F. Steinberg, Andreas Dimmelmeier, Laia Domènech, Jacob Beck, Malte Schierholz, Emily Kormanyos, Maurice Fehr
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Reliable company-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data are essential for stakeholders addressing the climate crisis. However, existing datasets are often fragmented, inconsistent, and lack transparent methodologies, making it difficult to obtain reliable emissions data. To address this challenge, we present a gold standard dataset containing emission metrics extracted from 139 sustainability reports collected from company websites. This dataset acts as an intermediate step to validate and fine-tune models for large-scale extraction of emissions data from thousands of reports. We employ a Large Language Model (LLM)-powered extraction pipeline to automatically extract emissions metrics. These values are then independently assessed by two non-expert annotators. Reports with full agreement are directly considered gold standard, while discrepancies undergo expert review in two stages, with remaining disagreements resolved through in-person discussions. This structured process ensures high data quality while reducing reliance on experts. Our dataset serves as a benchmark for human and automated annotation, with significant reuse potential for information extraction tasks in sustainable finance as well as other downstream tasks such as greenwashing analysis.

Scientific DataVol. 12(1)
Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (DE), Munich School of Philosophy (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Deutsche Bundesbank (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.