Coping With Political‐Ideological Pressure: How Street‐Level Bureaucrats Shield Policy Implementation From Politicization

ABSTRACT While pursuing a professional delivery of public services, street‐level bureaucrats increasingly face intense political‐ideological pressure. Yet, preceding scholars have barely explored how they manage to resist it. Addressing this gap, the paper presents a concept of the coping mechanisms street‐level bureaucrats employ to shield their discretionary practices from becoming politicized. It is derived from an exploratory interview study with 33 case managers at German local jobcentres. Drawing on an abductive conceptualization, it identifies four distinct mechanisms which may serve either the function of moving against ideological demands ( professional superiority , disenchanting ) or of moving away from them ( externalizing responsibility , segmentation ). The paper offers novel insights into street‐level bureaucrats' professional position and its relationship with political ideologies. It thereby contributes to a better understanding of how street‐level bureaucracies preserve a competent execution of state acting in times when ideological conflict lines have become highly polarized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Governance
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70052
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coping With Political‐Ideological Pressure: How Street‐Level Bureaucrats Shield Policy Implementation From Politicization

Laurin Friedrich
4 citations
Governance
Social Policy and Reform Studies
34.09
article

Coping With Political‐Ideological Pressure: How Street‐Level Bureaucrats Shield Policy Implementation From Politicization

Laurin Friedrich
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT While pursuing a professional delivery of public services, street‐level bureaucrats increasingly face intense political‐ideological pressure. Yet, preceding scholars have barely explored how they manage to resist it. Addressing this gap, the paper presents a concept of the coping mechanisms street‐level bureaucrats employ to shield their discretionary practices from becoming politicized. It is derived from an exploratory interview study with 33 case managers at German local jobcentres. Drawing on an abductive conceptualization, it identifies four distinct mechanisms which may serve either the function of moving against ideological demands ( professional superiority , disenchanting ) or of moving away from them ( externalizing responsibility , segmentation ). The paper offers novel insights into street‐level bureaucrats' professional position and its relationship with political ideologies. It thereby contributes to a better understanding of how street‐level bureaucracies preserve a competent execution of state acting in times when ideological conflict lines have become highly polarized.

GovernanceVol. 38(4)
University of Konstanz (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Hans Böckler Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coping With Political‐Ideological Pressure: How Street‐Level Bureaucrats Shield Policy Implementation From Politicization — Laurin Friedrich · Governance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS