Irony and sarcasm in political speech: A pragmatic perspective

This study investigates the pragmatics of irony and sarcasm in political speech, focusing on how these linguistic phenomena are understood and employed in social interactions. Irony and sarcasm serve as complex communicative tools that convey meanings beyond their literal interpretations, often relying on contextual cues, speaker intent, and listener interpretation. The findings reveal that contextual knowledge, cultural background, and social relationships significantly affect how individuals perceive irony and sarcasm. Additionally, the study highlights the role of non-verbal cues in enhancing understanding and mitigating potential misunderstandings. This research contributes to the broader field of pragmatics by elucidating the nuanced ways in which irony and sarcasm function in political speech, emphasizing their importance in expressing humor, criticism, and social commentary. Ultimately, the study aims to enhance awareness of these rhetorical devices and their implications for effective communication in various contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in English
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26648717.2025.v7.i2e.468
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Irony and sarcasm in political speech: A pragmatic perspective

Isa Atallah Salman, Nasser Karee Nasser
1 links
International Journal of Research in English
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Irony and sarcasm in political speech: A pragmatic perspective

Isa Atallah Salman, Nasser Karee Nasser
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the pragmatics of irony and sarcasm in political speech, focusing on how these linguistic phenomena are understood and employed in social interactions. Irony and sarcasm serve as complex communicative tools that convey meanings beyond their literal interpretations, often relying on contextual cues, speaker intent, and listener interpretation. The findings reveal that contextual knowledge, cultural background, and social relationships significantly affect how individuals perceive irony and sarcasm. Additionally, the study highlights the role of non-verbal cues in enhancing understanding and mitigating potential misunderstandings. This research contributes to the broader field of pragmatics by elucidating the nuanced ways in which irony and sarcasm function in political speech, emphasizing their importance in expressing humor, criticism, and social commentary. Ultimately, the study aims to enhance awareness of these rhetorical devices and their implications for effective communication in various contexts.

International Journal of Research in EnglishVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Irony and sarcasm in political speech: A pragmatic perspective — Isa Atallah Salman, Nasser Karee Nasser · International Journal of Research in English (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS