Human bone marrow derived stem cell differentiation on 3D printed bioactive glass scaffolds

Bioactive glass particles have previously been found to stimulate new bone growth in vivo and have a long clinical track record. The effect of bioactive glasses on human bone marrow derived stromal cells (hBMSCs) has not been clearly ascertained previously. Recently, 3D printed scaffolds of the ICIE16 glass composition (49.46 mol% SiO<sub>2</sub>, 36.6 mol% CaO, 6.6 mol% Na<sub>2</sub>O, 6.6 mol% K<sub>2</sub>O, 1.07 mol% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) were found to produce high quality bone ingrowth in vivo in a rabbit model. This composition was chosen because it can be sintered into scaffolds without crystallisation. Here, we cultured hBMSCs on the 3D printed ICIE16 scaffolds to determine whether the scaffolds can support cell growth and osteogenic differentiation in vitro, with and without the presence of osteogenic supplements. This was compared to a control of culture media containing dissolution products of the bioactive glass scaffold. Our hypothesis was that the cells cultured on the scaffolds would undergo more osteogenic differentiation than cells cultured in media containing only the dissolution ions of the scaffolds, even without osteogenic supplements. hBMSCs cultured on ICIE16 scaffolds significantly increased expression of osteogenic differentiation and matrix formation markers, including Runx 2, Col1a1, Osteopontin, Osteocalcin and Alkaline Phosphatase, in comparison to monolayer cultures in basal conditions with bioactive glass dissolution products, at all time points up to 6 weeks. Six weeks was chosen as it is the time scale for bone fracture healing. The presence of osteogenic supplements appeared to have synergetic effects with 3D scaffolds, especially during early stages of osteogenic differentiation (week 2 and 4). By week 6, there was no significant difference in the expression of osteogenic markers by hBMSCs cultured on ICE16 scaffolds with and without osteogenic supplements. These findings support our hypothesis and highlight that the 3D structure and the dissolution of ICIE16 bioactive glass ionic products both independently influence osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-025-06918-y
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human bone marrow derived stem cell differentiation on 3D printed bioactive glass scaffolds

Fadi Barrak, Agathe Heyraud, Julian R. Jones, Amy Nommeots‐Nomm et al.
Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Human bone marrow derived stem cell differentiation on 3D printed bioactive glass scaffolds

Fadi Barrak, Agathe Heyraud, Julian R. Jones, Amy Nommeots‐Nomm, Xiaomeng Shi, Ali A. Mohammed, Siwei Li
article en

Abstract

Bioactive glass particles have previously been found to stimulate new bone growth in vivo and have a long clinical track record. The effect of bioactive glasses on human bone marrow derived stromal cells (hBMSCs) has not been clearly ascertained previously. Recently, 3D printed scaffolds of the ICIE16 glass composition (49.46 mol% SiO<sub>2</sub>, 36.6 mol% CaO, 6.6 mol% Na<sub>2</sub>O, 6.6 mol% K<sub>2</sub>O, 1.07 mol% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) were found to produce high quality bone ingrowth in vivo in a rabbit model. This composition was chosen because it can be sintered into scaffolds without crystallisation. Here, we cultured hBMSCs on the 3D printed ICIE16 scaffolds to determine whether the scaffolds can support cell growth and osteogenic differentiation in vitro, with and without the presence of osteogenic supplements. This was compared to a control of culture media containing dissolution products of the bioactive glass scaffold. Our hypothesis was that the cells cultured on the scaffolds would undergo more osteogenic differentiation than cells cultured in media containing only the dissolution ions of the scaffolds, even without osteogenic supplements. hBMSCs cultured on ICIE16 scaffolds significantly increased expression of osteogenic differentiation and matrix formation markers, including Runx 2, Col1a1, Osteopontin, Osteocalcin and Alkaline Phosphatase, in comparison to monolayer cultures in basal conditions with bioactive glass dissolution products, at all time points up to 6 weeks. Six weeks was chosen as it is the time scale for bone fracture healing. The presence of osteogenic supplements appeared to have synergetic effects with 3D scaffolds, especially during early stages of osteogenic differentiation (week 2 and 4). By week 6, there was no significant difference in the expression of osteogenic markers by hBMSCs cultured on ICE16 scaffolds with and without osteogenic supplements. These findings support our hypothesis and highlight that the 3D structure and the dissolution of ICIE16 bioactive glass ionic products both independently influence osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs.

Journal of Materials Science Materials in MedicineVol. 36(1)
Royal College of Art (GB), Dyson (United Kingdom) (GB), Health Education England (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Qatar Foundation, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.