Resisting persuasion in cases of ideological conflict: The role of foreign language processing

Abstract We corroborate findings showing a disparity in one’s willingness to update political beliefs in the face of counterevidence among bilinguals, examining the role of the Foreign Language effect (FLe) on belief maintenance. 133 Liberal English-Spanish bilinguals and 70 English monolinguals showed that belief change on political issues is lesser than on nonpolitical issues following counterevidence. Bilinguals, however, showed greater change in the second language (L2) compared to the first and greater belief change than the monolinguals overall. The second language also led to slower reading and rating times across all conditions, which corresponded with greater belief change. Among bilinguals using their L2, those most likely to show belief change reported having a less meaningful connection to the foreign language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728925100473
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resisting persuasion in cases of ideological conflict: The role of foreign language processing

David Miller, Cecilia Solís-Barroso, David Abugaber, John Aníbal Escalante Martínez
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Resisting persuasion in cases of ideological conflict: The role of foreign language processing

David Miller, Cecilia Solís-Barroso, David Abugaber, John Aníbal Escalante Martínez
article en

Abstract

Abstract We corroborate findings showing a disparity in one’s willingness to update political beliefs in the face of counterevidence among bilinguals, examining the role of the Foreign Language effect (FLe) on belief maintenance. 133 Liberal English-Spanish bilinguals and 70 English monolinguals showed that belief change on political issues is lesser than on nonpolitical issues following counterevidence. Bilinguals, however, showed greater change in the second language (L2) compared to the first and greater belief change than the monolinguals overall. The second language also led to slower reading and rating times across all conditions, which corresponded with greater belief change. Among bilinguals using their L2, those most likely to show belief change reported having a less meaningful connection to the foreign language.

Bilingualism Language and Cognition
University of Michigan (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resisting persuasion in cases of ideological conflict: The role of foreign language processing — David Miller, Cecilia Solís-Barroso, et al. · Bilingualism Language and Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS