Social aspects of species reintroduction: the case of BOOM

Abstract: Reintroducing threatened species is a dynamic ecological restoration approach, but it faces socio-political challenges. Social aspects of species reintroductions are not adequately addressed by practitioners or scholars. Using the Narrative Policy Framework, I analyze the case of a translocation program that did emphasize socio-political engagement. Back on Our Map (BOOM) sought to reintroduce or reinforce ten locally endangered species in Cumbria, UK. While BOOM operated in an ecologically and socially fragmented setting, its many partners shared a common narrative of rapid ecological decline and human disconnection from nature. This created a socio-political dynamic that supported BOOM and its partners for both its ecological contribution and for facilitating community engagement with nature. BOOM’s approach avoided socio-political barriers, but its work was limited by landscape fragmentation and short-term funding. Key policy highlights: Species reintroduction fits diverse stakeholders’ socio-political narratives and facilitates coalition-building. Careful species selection can raise political support and public engagement. Reintroduction projects should emphasize landscape connectivity and long-term sustainability beyond funding timelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystems and People
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2025.2513892
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social aspects of species reintroduction: the case of BOOM

Peter Brewitt
1 citations
Ecosystems and People
Forest Management and Policy
1.11
article

Social aspects of species reintroduction: the case of BOOM

Peter Brewitt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Reintroducing threatened species is a dynamic ecological restoration approach, but it faces socio-political challenges. Social aspects of species reintroductions are not adequately addressed by practitioners or scholars. Using the Narrative Policy Framework, I analyze the case of a translocation program that did emphasize socio-political engagement. Back on Our Map (BOOM) sought to reintroduce or reinforce ten locally endangered species in Cumbria, UK. While BOOM operated in an ecologically and socially fragmented setting, its many partners shared a common narrative of rapid ecological decline and human disconnection from nature. This created a socio-political dynamic that supported BOOM and its partners for both its ecological contribution and for facilitating community engagement with nature. BOOM’s approach avoided socio-political barriers, but its work was limited by landscape fragmentation and short-term funding. Key policy highlights: Species reintroduction fits diverse stakeholders’ socio-political narratives and facilitates coalition-building. Careful species selection can raise political support and public engagement. Reintroduction projects should emphasize landscape connectivity and long-term sustainability beyond funding timelines.

Ecosystems and PeopleVol. 21(1)
Wofford College (US), University of Cumbria (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Forest Management and Policy
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social aspects of species reintroduction: the case of BOOM — Peter Brewitt · Ecosystems and People (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS