Multilateralism at a Crossroads: Rethinking <scp>UK</scp> Status and Influence at the <scp>UN</scp> Security Council

ABSTRACT During a period of increased global tensions over the future direction of multilateralism, the UN Security Council faces significant questions over its continued legitimacy. Consequently, demands for formal reform initiatives have grown, challenging the unequal distribution of power within the Council and the continued influence of colonial legacies. Yet despite these claims, it is still commonly assumed that the UK must work to retain all the key privileges that come from holding a permanent seat to help maintain its status and prestige. In contrast, we outline how the UK's current position actually fuels resentment and undermines the post‐Brexit ‘Global Britain’ agenda. In response, this article offers a non‐ideal solution where the UK retains its permanent seat but aligns its use with national interests through bringing forward informal delegation practices and coalition building, as well as developing innovative working methods to generate greater cooperation between permanent and elected members. In doing so we argue that through a more delegated approach the UK could demonstrate its commitment to fairness and multilateralism in a way that wins allies and positions it as a leading advocate for reform even in a time of increased great power competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70065
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilateralism at a Crossroads: Rethinking UK Status and Influence at the UN Security Council

Thomas Peak, Samuel Jarvis
Global Policy
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Multilateralism at a Crossroads: Rethinking UK Status and Influence at the UN Security Council

Thomas Peak, Samuel Jarvis
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT During a period of increased global tensions over the future direction of multilateralism, the UN Security Council faces significant questions over its continued legitimacy. Consequently, demands for formal reform initiatives have grown, challenging the unequal distribution of power within the Council and the continued influence of colonial legacies. Yet despite these claims, it is still commonly assumed that the UK must work to retain all the key privileges that come from holding a permanent seat to help maintain its status and prestige. In contrast, we outline how the UK's current position actually fuels resentment and undermines the post‐Brexit ‘Global Britain’ agenda. In response, this article offers a non‐ideal solution where the UK retains its permanent seat but aligns its use with national interests through bringing forward informal delegation practices and coalition building, as well as developing innovative working methods to generate greater cooperation between permanent and elected members. In doing so we argue that through a more delegated approach the UK could demonstrate its commitment to fairness and multilateralism in a way that wins allies and positions it as a leading advocate for reform even in a time of increased great power competition.

Global PolicyVol. 16(5)
York St John University (GB), Vilnius University (LT), International Business School at Vilnius University (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.