Comparative Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of Wear-Resistant Structural Steels

This paper presents the results of wear tests of two types of commercial low-carbon, low-alloy martensitic abrasion-resistant steels, Hardox 450 and XAR 450, which belong to the hardness class 450 HBW. These steels, due to their increased resistance to the abrasive wear mechanism, are used for machine parts for applications in intensive abrasion environments such as construction, mining, and agriculture. The scope of work included microstructure analysis on an optical microscope, chemical composition analysis, Vickers hardness measurements at different loads (HV0.2, HV1 and HV2), and wear testing. Wear tests were carried out by the standard method "dry sand-rubber wheel", and tests on the Taber abrader device. Microstructure analysis revealed that both steels have a similar non-oriented, homogenous, fine-grained martensitic microstructure. The results of HV2 hardness measurements showed a similar trend for both steels in all examined sections of the plates. For both tested steels, the hardness values of HV0.2 and HV1 are slightly higher than HV2, but the scattering of the results is also greater. Abrasion resistance testing using the standard "dry sand-rubber wheel" method showed that Hardox 450 steel has a lower volume loss of about 8%, but a greater scattering of the results compared to XAR 450 steel. The results of the abrasion resistance test on the Taber abrader device confirmed approximately the same behavior. For both steels, a prediction model was established for a reliable assessment of the wear intensity concerning the grain size. Although examined steels belong to the same hardness class, Hardox steel seems to be a more appropriate choice for the manufacture of machine components exposed to abrasive wear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18174002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of Wear-Resistant Structural Steels

Danko Ćorić, Tomislav Rodinger, Vera Rede, Zrinka Švagelj et al.
1 citations
Materials
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
0.52
article

Comparative Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of Wear-Resistant Structural Steels

Danko Ćorić, Tomislav Rodinger, Vera Rede, Zrinka Švagelj, Helena Lukšić
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the results of wear tests of two types of commercial low-carbon, low-alloy martensitic abrasion-resistant steels, Hardox 450 and XAR 450, which belong to the hardness class 450 HBW. These steels, due to their increased resistance to the abrasive wear mechanism, are used for machine parts for applications in intensive abrasion environments such as construction, mining, and agriculture. The scope of work included microstructure analysis on an optical microscope, chemical composition analysis, Vickers hardness measurements at different loads (HV0.2, HV1 and HV2), and wear testing. Wear tests were carried out by the standard method "dry sand-rubber wheel", and tests on the Taber abrader device. Microstructure analysis revealed that both steels have a similar non-oriented, homogenous, fine-grained martensitic microstructure. The results of HV2 hardness measurements showed a similar trend for both steels in all examined sections of the plates. For both tested steels, the hardness values of HV0.2 and HV1 are slightly higher than HV2, but the scattering of the results is also greater. Abrasion resistance testing using the standard "dry sand-rubber wheel" method showed that Hardox 450 steel has a lower volume loss of about 8%, but a greater scattering of the results compared to XAR 450 steel. The results of the abrasion resistance test on the Taber abrader device confirmed approximately the same behavior. For both steels, a prediction model was established for a reliable assessment of the wear intensity concerning the grain size. Although examined steels belong to the same hardness class, Hardox steel seems to be a more appropriate choice for the manufacture of machine components exposed to abrasive wear.

MaterialsVol. 18(17)
University of Zagreb (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.