l-‘Ilal Al-Saghīr: Karya ‘IlalAtau Usul Al-Ḥadith? Kajian Perbandingan Dengan Muqaddimah ṢaḥīḥMuslim

The science of uṣūl al-ḥadīth is a fundamental discipline in hadith studies that establishes the principles and methodologies for understanding and evaluating hadith. One of the works traditionally associated with this field is al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr by al-Tirmidhi, which has often been categorized as a work in ‘ilal al-ḥadīth. However, its structure and methodological approach raise questions about whether it should be more accurately classified as a work of uṣūl al-ḥadīth rather than ‘ilal al-ḥadīth. This study reassesses the classification of al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr through a comparative analysis with Muqaddimah Ṣaḥī ḥ Muslim by Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj, a recognized cornerstone of uṣūl al-ḥadīth. Using a qualitative methodology, this research employs document analysis and content analysis to examine the structure, themes, and methodologies of both works. The findings indicate that al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr does not focus primarily on ‘ilal al-ḥadīth but rather encompasses broader discussions on muṣṭalaḥal-ḥadīth, al-jarḥ wa al-ta‘dīl, and general principles of hadith authentication. In contrast, Muqaddimah Ṣaḥī ḥ Muslim systematically elaborates on foundational uṣūl al-ḥadīth, with a clear emphasis on the criteria for accepting and rejecting hadith. Neither work delves deeply into ‘ilal al-ḥadīth, as Muslim’s dedicated work, al-Tamyīz, serves that function. The study concludes that al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr aligns more closely with uṣūl al-ḥadīth rather than ‘ilal al-ḥadīth. This reclassification refines the understanding of its academic positioning and contributes to a more accurate classification within hadith studies. The study also suggests further research on the pedagogical implications of teaching al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr, as instructional approaches may influence its perceived classification. Additionally, future comparisons with other uṣūl al-ḥadīth works, such as Risālah ilā Ahl Makkah by Abū Dāwud, could provide further insights into the evolution of hadith methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jamalullail Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64638/jj.v4i1.008
Primary Topic
Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

l-‘Ilal Al-Saghīr: Karya ‘IlalAtau Usul Al-Ḥadith? Kajian Perbandingan Dengan Muqaddimah ṢaḥīḥMuslim

Dzulfaidi Hakimie Dzulraidi
Jamalullail Journal
Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
article

l-‘Ilal Al-Saghīr: Karya ‘IlalAtau Usul Al-Ḥadith? Kajian Perbandingan Dengan Muqaddimah ṢaḥīḥMuslim

Dzulfaidi Hakimie Dzulraidi
article en

Abstract

The science of uṣūl al-ḥadīth is a fundamental discipline in hadith studies that establishes the principles and methodologies for understanding and evaluating hadith. One of the works traditionally associated with this field is al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr by al-Tirmidhi, which has often been categorized as a work in ‘ilal al-ḥadīth. However, its structure and methodological approach raise questions about whether it should be more accurately classified as a work of uṣūl al-ḥadīth rather than ‘ilal al-ḥadīth. This study reassesses the classification of al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr through a comparative analysis with Muqaddimah Ṣaḥī ḥ Muslim by Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj, a recognized cornerstone of uṣūl al-ḥadīth. Using a qualitative methodology, this research employs document analysis and content analysis to examine the structure, themes, and methodologies of both works. The findings indicate that al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr does not focus primarily on ‘ilal al-ḥadīth but rather encompasses broader discussions on muṣṭalaḥal-ḥadīth, al-jarḥ wa al-ta‘dīl, and general principles of hadith authentication. In contrast, Muqaddimah Ṣaḥī ḥ Muslim systematically elaborates on foundational uṣūl al-ḥadīth, with a clear emphasis on the criteria for accepting and rejecting hadith. Neither work delves deeply into ‘ilal al-ḥadīth, as Muslim’s dedicated work, al-Tamyīz, serves that function. The study concludes that al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr aligns more closely with uṣūl al-ḥadīth rather than ‘ilal al-ḥadīth. This reclassification refines the understanding of its academic positioning and contributes to a more accurate classification within hadith studies. The study also suggests further research on the pedagogical implications of teaching al-‘Ilal al-Ṣaghīr, as instructional approaches may influence its perceived classification. Additionally, future comparisons with other uṣūl al-ḥadīth works, such as Risālah ilā Ahl Makkah by Abū Dāwud, could provide further insights into the evolution of hadith methodology.

Jamalullail JournalVol. 4(1)
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (MY), Universiti of Malaysia Sabah (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

l-‘Ilal Al-Saghīr: Karya ‘IlalAtau Usul Al-Ḥadith? Kajian Perbandingan Dengan Muqaddimah ṢaḥīḥMuslim — Dzulfaidi Hakimie Dzulraidi · Jamalullail Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS