Linear Distance, Agreement Attraction, and WM Effects on L1 Thai Learners’ Processing of L2 English Third-Person Singular Subject-Verb Agreement

This study investigated the effects of linear distance, agreement attraction, and working memory (WM) on the processing of English third-person singular subject-verb agreement by second language (L2) learners whose first language (L1) is Thai. Grounded in the Linear Distance Hypothesis (Gibson, 1998, 2000), the study hypothesized that linear distance, agreement attraction, and WM would affect L1 Thai/L2 English learners’ processing of the agreement in question. Thirty Thai-speaking nonnative speakers (NNSs) with advanced L2 proficiency and 30 native speakers (NSs) were included. A word-by-word self-paced reading task was employed to determine the three effects. The results revealed longer reading times (RTs) in the long-distance context (e.g., ‘The leaders in the cars meet on a monthly basis.’) compared to the short-distance counterpart (e.g., ‘The waiter lives in a small town.’) in the critical region, i.e., the verb, for both the NNSs and the NSs. The agreement attraction effect was not observed in either the NS or the NNS data as similar RTs were obtained between the matched (e.g., ‘The teen on the ladder works on her summer break.’) and mismatched (e.g., ‘*The lawyers on the ship travels from city to city.’) conditions. This was speculated to be due to the mismatch asymmetry effect (Barker & Nicol, 2000). WM and its interaction effects with linear distance and agreement attraction were partially observed as the low WM group exhibited shorter RTs in the ungrammatical-mismatched compared to the high WM counterpart. The effect of WM was assumed to be moderated by the NNSs’ high proficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
rEFLections
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i2.283201
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear Distance, Agreement Attraction, and WM Effects on L1 Thai Learners’ Processing of L2 English Third-Person Singular Subject-Verb Agreement

Nattama Pongpairoj, Montira Berteau
rEFLections
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Linear Distance, Agreement Attraction, and WM Effects on L1 Thai Learners’ Processing of L2 English Third-Person Singular Subject-Verb Agreement

Nattama Pongpairoj, Montira Berteau
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of linear distance, agreement attraction, and working memory (WM) on the processing of English third-person singular subject-verb agreement by second language (L2) learners whose first language (L1) is Thai. Grounded in the Linear Distance Hypothesis (Gibson, 1998, 2000), the study hypothesized that linear distance, agreement attraction, and WM would affect L1 Thai/L2 English learners’ processing of the agreement in question. Thirty Thai-speaking nonnative speakers (NNSs) with advanced L2 proficiency and 30 native speakers (NSs) were included. A word-by-word self-paced reading task was employed to determine the three effects. The results revealed longer reading times (RTs) in the long-distance context (e.g., ‘The leaders in the cars meet on a monthly basis.’) compared to the short-distance counterpart (e.g., ‘The waiter lives in a small town.’) in the critical region, i.e., the verb, for both the NNSs and the NSs. The agreement attraction effect was not observed in either the NS or the NNS data as similar RTs were obtained between the matched (e.g., ‘The teen on the ladder works on her summer break.’) and mismatched (e.g., ‘*The lawyers on the ship travels from city to city.’) conditions. This was speculated to be due to the mismatch asymmetry effect (Barker & Nicol, 2000). WM and its interaction effects with linear distance and agreement attraction were partially observed as the low WM group exhibited shorter RTs in the ungrammatical-mismatched compared to the high WM counterpart. The effect of WM was assumed to be moderated by the NNSs’ high proficiency.

rEFLectionsVol. 32(2)
Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.